首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Mapping the information landscape of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration Strategy
Authors:Paula Meli  Daniella Schweizer  Leigh A. Winowiecki  Susan Chomba  Ermias Aynekulu  Manuel R. Guariguata
Affiliation:1. Departamento de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de La Frontera, Av. Francisco Salazar 01145, Temuco, Chile;2. Restor, Fraumünsterstrasse 16, Zürich, Switzerland;3. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and World Agroforestry (ICRAF), UN Avenue, P. O. Box 30677-00100 Nairobi, Kenya;4. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Av. La Molina 1895, Lima, Peru
Abstract:The strategy of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration identifies three pathways for action for overcoming six global barriers thought to hamper upscaling. We evaluated 6,023 peer-reviewed and gray literature papers published over the last two decades to map the information landscape underlying the barriers and associated pathways for action across world regions, terrestrial ecosystem types, restorative interventions and their outcomes. Overall, the literature addressed more the financial and legislative barriers than the technical and research-related ones, supporting the view that social, economic and political factors hamper scaling up ecosystem restoration. Latin America, Africa, and North America were the most prominent regions in the literature, yet differed in the number of publications addressing each barrier. An overwhelming number of publications focused on forests (78%), while grasslands (6%), drylands (3%), and mangroves (2%) received less attention. Across the three pathways for action, the action lines on (1) promoting long-term ecosystem restoration actions and monitoring and (2) education on restoration were the most underrepresented in the literature. In general, restorative interventions assessed rendered positive outcomes except those of a political, legislative or financial nature which reported negative or inconclusive outcomes. Our indicative assessment reveals critical information gaps on barriers, pathways, and types of restorative interventions across world regions, particularly related to specific social issues such as education for ecosystem restoration. Finally, we call for refining “strength of evidence” assessment frameworks that can systematically appraise, synthesize and integrate information on traditional and practitioner knowledge as two essential components for improving decision-making in ecosystem restoration.
Keywords:barriers  ecosystem restoration  evidence base  pathways  restorative interventions  systematic review  United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号