Alternate substrate inhibition of cholesterol esterase by thieno[2,3-d][1,3]oxazin-4-ones

In a kinetic study, the interaction of bovine pancreatic cholesterol esterase (CEase) with fused 1,3-oxazin-4-ones and 1,3-thiazin-4-ones was investigated, and the compounds were characterized as alternate substrate inhibitors. Inhibition assays were performed in the presence of sodium taurocholate with p-nitrophenyl butyrate as chromogenic substrate. Strong active site-directed inhibition was detected for 2-diethylaminothieno[2,3-d][1,3]oxazin-4-ones with a cycloaliphatic chain at positions 5,6. The most potent inhibitors, compounds 3 and 4, exhibited K(i) values of 0.58 and 1.86 microm, respectively. An exchange of the ring oxygen by sulfur and the removal of the cycloaliphatic moiety as well as the replacement of the thiophene ring by benzene led to a loss of inhibitory potency. CEase has the capability to catalyze the hydrolysis of representatives of fused 1,3-oxazin-4-ones as well as the highly stable 1,3-thiazin-4-ones by using an acylation-deacylation mechanism. Hydrolyses were performed in the presence of a high enzyme concentration, and products were identified spectrophotometrically and by means of high performance liquid chromatography. The kinetic parameters V(max)I and V(max)I/K(m)(I) for the CEase-catalyzed turnover were determined. The compounds whose enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis followed first-order kinetics (K(m)(I) > 25 microm) failed to inhibit CEase. On the other hand, inhibitors 3 (initial concentration of 25 microm) and 4 (20 microm) were hydrolyzed by CEase under steady-state conditions in the first phase of the reaction. Rate-limiting deacylation was demonstrated in nucleophilic competition experiments with ethanol as acyl acceptor wherein the conversion of compound 3 was accelerated up to an ethanol concentration of 1.5 m. The characterization of these compounds (i.e. 3 and 4) as alternate substrate inhibitors is not only based on the verification of the CEase-catalyzed hydrolysis. It also rests upon the concurrence of corresponding K(i) values obtained in the inhibition assay compared with separately determined K(m)(I) values of their enzyme-catalyzed consumption, as could be predicted from the kinetic model used in this study.