Categorical Default Uncertainty Factors-Interspecies Variation and Adequacy of Database |
| |
Authors: | M.E. Meek |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Environmental Health Centre, Health Canada, Tunney's Pasture;2. Ottawa, Ont., Canada. K1A 0L2 Address Locator: 0801C2;3. Telephone: (613) 957-3129;4. Fax: (613) 954-2486;5. E-mail: Bette_Meek@hc-sc.gc.ca |
| |
Abstract: | The potential application of categorical (i.e., species, pathway, or group specific) defaults for several components of uncertainty relevant to development of tolerable or reference concentrations/doses is considered-namely, interspecies variation and adequacy of database. For the former, the adequacy of allometric scaling by body surface area as a species-specific default for oral tolerable or reference doses is considered. For the latter, the extent to which data from analyses of subchronic:chronic effect levels, LOAELs/NOAELs, and critical effect levels for complete versus incomplete datasets informs selection of defaults is examined. The relative role of categorical defaults for these aspects is considered in the context of the continuum of increasingly data-informed approaches to characterization of uncertainty and variability that range from default (“presumed protective”) to “biologically based predictive”. |
| |
Keywords: | uncertainty variability tolerable or reference dose/ concentration interspecies variation body surface area scaling adequacy of database categorical default. |
|
|