TB Screening in Canadian Health Care Workers Using Interferon-Gamma Release Assays |
| |
Authors: | Alice Zwerling Mihaela Cojocariu Fiona McIntosh Filomena Pietrangelo Marcel A Behr Kevin Schwartzman Andrea Benedetti Nandini Dendukuri Dick Menzies Madhukar Pai |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. |
| |
Abstract: | BackgroundWhile many North American healthcare institutions are switching from Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) to Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), there is relatively limited data on association between occupational tuberculosis (TB) risk factors and test positivity and/or patterns of test discordance.MethodsWe recruited a cohort of Canadian health care workers (HCWs) in Montreal, and performed both TST and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In Tube (QFT) tests, and assessed risk factors and occupational exposure.ResultsIn a cross-sectional analysis of baseline results, the prevalence of TST positivity using the 10 mm cut-off was 5.7% (22/388, 95%CI: 3.6–8.5%), while QFT positivity was 6.2% (24/388, 95%CI: 4–9.1%). Overall agreement between the tests was poor (kappa = 0.26), and 8.3% of HCWs had discordant test results, most frequently TST−/QFT+ (17/388, 4.4%). TST positivity was associated with total years worked in health care, non-occupational exposure to TB and BCG vaccination received after infancy or on multiple occasions. QFT positivity was associated with having worked as a HCW in a foreign country.ConclusionsOur results suggest that LTBI prevalence as measured by either the TST or the QFT is low in this HCW population. Of concern is the high frequency of unexplainable test discordance, namely: TST−/QFT+ subjects, and the lack of any association between QFT positivity and clear-cut recent TB exposure. If these discordant results are indeed false positives, the use of QFT in lieu of TST in low TB incidence settings could result in overtreatment of uninfected individuals. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|