首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


A framework for the practical science necessary to restore sustainable,resilient, and biodiverse ecosystems
Authors:Ben P Miller  Elizabeth A Sinclair  Myles H M Menz  Carole P Elliott  Eric Bunn  Lucy E Commander  Emma Dalziell  Erica David  Belinda Davis  Todd E Erickson  Peter J Golos  Siegfried L Krauss  Wolfgang Lewandrowski  C Ellery Mayence  Luis Merino‐Martín  David J Merritt  Paul G Nevill  Ryan D Phillips  Alison L Ritchie  Sacha Ruoss  Jason C Stevens
Institution:1. Science Directorate, Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, Kings Park, WA, Australia;2. School of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia;3. Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia;4. Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland;5. School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Environment and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia;6. Tejon Ranch Conservancy, Frazier Park, CA, U.S.A.;7. INRA, UMR AMAP, Montpellier F‐34000, Montpellier, France;8. Department of Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia;9. Evolution, Ecology and Genetics, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Abstract:Demand for restoration of resilient, self‐sustaining, and biodiverse natural ecosystems as a conservation measure is increasing globally; however, restoration efforts frequently fail to meet standards appropriate for this objective. Achieving these standards requires management underpinned by input from diverse scientific disciplines including ecology, biotechnology, engineering, soil science, ecophysiology, and genetics. Despite increasing restoration research activity, a gap between the immediate needs of restoration practitioners and the outputs of restoration science often limits the effectiveness of restoration programs. Regrettably, studies often fail to identify the practical issues most critical for restoration success. We propose that part of this oversight may result from the absence of a considered statement of the necessary practical restoration science questions. Here we develop a comprehensive framework of the research required to bridge this gap and guide effective restoration. We structure questions in five themes: (1) setting targets and planning for success, (2) sourcing biological material, (3) optimizing establishment, (4) facilitating growth and survival, and (5) restoring resilience, sustainability, and landscape integration. This framework will assist restoration practitioners and scientists to identify knowledge gaps and develop strategic research focused on applied outcomes. The breadth of questions highlights the importance of cross‐discipline collaboration among restoration scientists, and while the program is broad, successful restoration projects have typically invested in many or most of these themes. Achieving restoration ecology's goal of averting biodiversity losses is a vast challenge: investment in appropriate science is urgently needed for ecological restoration to fulfill its potential and meet demand as a conservation tool.
Keywords:ecophysiology  ecosystem function  genetics  science strategy  seed science  soil science
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号