Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment |
| |
| Authors: | Brian Leung,Nuria Roura‐Pascual,Sven Bacher,Jaakko Heikkilä ,Lluis Brotons,Mark A Burgman,Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz,Franz Essl,Philip E Hulme,David M Richardson,Daniel Sol,Montserrat Vilà |
| |
| Abstract: | We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice. |
| |
| Keywords: | Colonisation exotic habitat suitability life history trait non‐indigenous policy propagule pressure risk analysis species distribution uncertainty |
|
|
