Germination sensitivities to water potential among co‐existing C3 and C4 grasses of cool semi‐arid prairie grasslands

An untested theory states that C₄ grass seeds could germinate under lower water potentials (Ψ) than C₃ grass seeds. We used hydrotime modelling to study seed water relations of C₄ and C₃ Canadian prairie grasses to address Ψ divergent sensitivities and germination strategies along a risk‐spreading continuum of responses to limited water. C₄ grasses were Bouteloua gracilis, Calamovilfa longifolia and Schizachyrium scoparium; C₃ grasses were Bromus carinatus, Elymus trachycaulus, Festuca hallii and Koeleria macrantha. Hydrotime parameters were obtained after incubation of non‐dormant seeds under different Ψ PEG 6000 solutions. A t‐test between C₃ and C₄ grasses did not find statistical differences in population mean base Ψ (Ψ_b(50)). We found idiosyncratic responses of C₄ grasses along the risk‐spreading continuum. B. gracilis showed a risk‐taker strategy of a species able to quickly germinate in a dry soil due to its low Ψ_b(50) and hydrotime (θ_H). The high Ψ_b(50) of S. scoparium indicates it follows the risk‐averse strategy so it can only germinate in wet soils. C. longifolia showed an intermediate strategy: the lowest Ψ_b(50) yet the highest θ_H. K. macrantha, a C₃ grass which thrives in dry habitats, had the highest Ψ_b(50), suggesting a risk‐averse strategy for a C₃ species. Other C₃ species showed intermediate germination patterns in response to Ψ relative to C₄ species. Our results indicate that grasses display germination sensitivities to Ψ across the risk‐spreading continuum of responses. Thus seed water relations may be poor predictors to explain differential recruitment and distribution of C₃ and C₄ grasses in the Canadian prairies.