The creation of specific hominid names: Gloria in excelsis deo? or ego? or praxis? |
| |
Authors: | C Loring Brace |
| |
Institution: | (1) Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, 48109 Ann Arbor, MI, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The recent recommendation that it is preferable to recognize too many rather than too few species in the fossil record has
led to a growing proliferation of specific names. Single specimens are being referred to different species by different authors,
and new species are being proposed based on the juxtaposition of specimens from different sites and time levels representing
different anatomical parts. In part this may represent the continuity of the Medieval assertion that a multitude of species
is a better demonstration of the goodness of a divinely created world than a multitude of individuals in a single species.
This has apparently accompanied the resurgence of the Medieval faith that species relationship are best demonstrated by the
application of hierarchical Aristotelean logic. On the other hand, the suspicion remains that the vanity of the namer is frequently
involved in the creation of new nomina. In general, anthropologists do not exhibit the “wide experience” and consequent “sound
judgment” that Darwin recommended as necessary for those giving specific names. If the same criteria used to assign specific
fossil names were applied to modern Homo sapiens, the different regional human populations would have to be recognized as
specifically distinct. In opposition to the recommendation that we should recognize ever more specific names, there should
be a moratorium called and no new species names should be proposed at all. The continuation of patterns of trivial trait configurations
associated with the various inhabited regions of the world clearly indicates genetic continuity through time but, unless it
can be shown that there is no reproductive continuity between one region and another, these differences do not warrant taxonomic
recognition. Major adaptive changes such as significant increases in relative brain size do warrant formal named recognition. |
| |
Keywords: | Taxonomy paleoanthropology hominid fossils |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|