Effect of pelvis impact angle on stresses at the femoral neck during falls |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering & Applied Mechanics, Bengal Engineering and Science University, Shibpur, Howrah 711103, West Bengal, India;2. KPC Medical College & Hospital, Jadavpur, Kolkata 700032, West Bengal, India;3. School of Education Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700032, India;1. Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, United States;2. Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, United States;3. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, United States;4. Robert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging and Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, United States;5. Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, United States;6. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Improved understanding is required of how the mechanics of the fall affect hip fracture risk. We used a hip impact simulator to determine how peak stresses at the femoral neck were affected by pelvis impact angle, hip abductor muscle force, and use of a wearable hip protector.We simulated falls from standing (2 m/s impact velocity) involving initial hip abductor muscle forces of 700 or 300 N. Trials were acquired for impact to the lateral aspect of the greater trochanter, and impact to the pelvis rotated 5°, 10° and 15° anteriorly (positive) or posteriorly (negative). Measures were acquired with and without a commercially available hip protector. During trials, we measured three-dimensional forces with a load cell at the femoral neck, and derived peak compressive and tensile stresses.Peak compressive stress increased 37% (5.91 versus 4.31 MPa; p < 0.0005) and peak tensile stress increased 209% (2.31 versus 0.75 MPa; p < 0.0005) when the pelvis impact angle changed from 15° anterior to −15° posterior. For lateral impacts, the peak tensile and compressive stresses averaged 73% and 8% lower, respectively, in the 700 N than 300 N muscle force condition, but the effect was reversed for anteriolateral or posteriolateral impacts. The attenuation in peak compressive stress from the hip protector was greatest for posteriolateral impacts (−15 to −5°; 36–41%), and least for anteriolateral (+15°; 10%).These results clarify the effects on hip fracture risk during a fall of pelvis impact angle and muscle forces, and should inform the design of improved hip protectors. |
| |
Keywords: | Falls Hip fracture Hip protector Muscle force Stress analysis |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|