Structural and dynamic effects of cholesterol at preferred sites of interaction with rhodopsin identified from microsecond length molecular dynamics simulations |
| |
Authors: | George Khelashvili Alan Grossfield Scott E. Feller Michael C. Pitman Harel Weinstein |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York 10021;2. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642;3. Department of Chemistry, Wabash College, Crawfordsville, Indiana 47933;4. IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598 |
| |
Abstract: | An unresolved question about GPCR function is the role of membrane components in receptor stability and activation. In particular, cholesterol is known to affect the function of membrane proteins, but the details of its effect on GPCRs are still elusive. Here, we describe how cholesterol modulates the behavior of the TM1‐TM2‐TM7‐helix 8(H8) functional network that comprises the highly conserved NPxxY(x)5,6F motif, through specific interactions with the receptor. The inferences are based on the analysis of microsecond length molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of rhodopsin in an explicit membrane environment. Three regions on the rhodopsin exhibit the highest cholesterol density throughout the trajectory: the extracellular end of TM7, a location resembling the high‐density sterol area from the electron microscopy data; the intracellular parts of TM1, TM2, and TM4, a region suggested as the cholesterol binding site in the recent X‐ray crystallography data on β2‐adrenergic GPCR; and the intracellular ends of TM2‐TM3, a location that was categorized as the high cholesterol density area in multiple independent 100 ns MD simulations of the same system. We found that cholesterol primarily affects specific local perturbations of the helical TM domains such as the kinks in TM1, TM2, and TM7. These local distortions, in turn, relate to rigid‐body motions of the TMs in the TM1‐TM2‐TM7‐H8 bundle. The specificity of the effects stems from the nonuniform distribution of cholesterol around the protein. Through correlation analysis we connect local effects of cholesterol on structural perturbations with a regulatory role of cholesterol in the structural rearrangements involved in GPCR function. Proteins 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
| |
Keywords: | GPCR membrane atomistic simulations signaling allosteric behavior |
|
|