Suppression of the Bacterial Spot Pathogen Xanthomonas euvesicatoria on Tomato Leaves by an Attenuated Mutant of Xanthomonas perforans

A bacteriocin-producing strain of the bacterial spot of tomato plant pathogen, Xanthomonas perforans, with attenuated pathogenicity was deployed for biocontrol of a bacteriocin-sensitive strain of the genetically closely related bacterial spot of tomato plant pathogen, X. euvesicatoria. The attenuated mutant (91-118ΔopgHΔbcnB) of X. perforans was tested in leaf tissue and shown to significantly inhibit internal populations of the wild-type X. euvesicatoria strain although significantly less than the wild-type 91-118 strain, whereas in a phyllosphere inhibition assay, the mutant strain reduced epiphytic populations comparably to 91-118. Thus, the attenuated mutant limited the sensitive bacterium more efficiently on the leaf surface than inside the leaf. In field experiments, weekly application of 91-118ΔopgHΔbcnB significantly reduced X. euvesicatoria populations compared to the growers’ standard control (copper hydroxide and mancozeb applied weekly and acibenzolar-S-methyl applied every 2 weeks). The biological control agent, 91-118ΔopgHΔbcnB, applied every 2 weeks also significantly reduced X. euvesicatoria populations in one season but was not significantly different from the growers’ standard control. Potentially, attenuated pathogenic strains could be deployed as biological control agents in order to improve disease control of foliar plant pathogens.Bacterial spot of tomato is incited by several Xanthomonas spp., including Xanthomonas euvesicatoria, X. perforans, and X. vesicatoria (13). On tomato plants, three races, designated tomato race 1 (T1), T2, and T3, were originally identified based on their reactions on three tomato genotypes (22, 23, 33, 37). These races, T1, T2, and T3, are principally members of X. euvesicatoria, X. vesicatoria, and X. perforans, respectively. Control of bacterial spot of tomato is extremely difficult when moderate-to-high temperatures and high moisture conditions exist. The disease causes significant damage to the crop, resulting in major losses (27). Management is primarily limited to bactericides, such as fixed coppers (3, 20, 32); however, copper-tolerant strains have become prevalent (31, 32) and chemical control alone is insufficient to control the disease under optimal weather conditions. Additionally, the use of copper compounds has led to soil contamination in some instances (16).Recently, there has been increased interest in integrated biological control strategies for bacterial diseases (5, 7, 11, 19, 23). However, optimization of biocontrol agents for consistent disease suppression for many bacterial diseases has been difficult. Studies are increasing our understanding of the ecology of nonpathogenic saprophytes as biocontrol agents, but their selection is limited to labor-intensive protocols. New biological control strategies are currently being sought, including the use of bacteriocins, bacteriophages, and attenuated plant pathogens (4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 23, 26, 35, 38).For many years, only X. euvesicatoria (T1) was present on tomato plants in Florida. In 1991, X. perforans (T3) appeared in Florida tomato fields (15) and eventually became the prevalent race (14). Following that observation, Jones et al. (12) demonstrated that when X. perforans and X. euvesicatoria were coinoculated onto tomato plants in the field, X. perforans displaced X. euvesicatoria and became the predominant strain. Further studies revealed that the competitive nature of X. perforans was due in large part to its antagonism toward X. euvesicatoria strains (9, 12, 36). Tudor-Nelson et al. (36) identified three different bacteriocins, designated BCN-A, BCN-B, and BCN-C, which were found to confer the ability to inhibit X. euvesicatoria strains in plate assays. Hert et al. (9) determined that these bacteriocins provided X. perforans strains with a competitive advantage in the greenhouse and field and that a mutant X. perforans strain expressing only BCN-A and BCN-C was most effective in displacing X. euvesicatoria and outcompeted wild-type (WT) X. perforans. Field experiments conducted with a nonpathogenic Hrp⁻ strain of X. perforans as a potential biocontrol agent for controlling X. euvesicatoria resulted in marginal control (18). Although the WT X. perforans strain has a competitive advantage over X. euvesicatoria populations, Hrp⁻ mutants such as that used in the study by Liu (18) do not appear to have the necessary competitiveness to suppress X. euvesicatoria populations.Previous research has focused on colonization of the plant by biocontrol agents to determine the relationship between invasion efficiency and biological control efficacy. For example, Frey et al. (8) achieved only low-to-moderate levels of biological control of a WT bacteriocin-sensitive strain of Ralstonia solanacearum when using a bacteriocin-producing nonpathogenic Hrp⁻ mutant strain of R. solanacearum. However, control using a moderately pathogenic hrp mutant (hrcV) capable of higher levels of colonization of the root and stem achieved greater disease suppression (6). Etchebar et al. (6) suggested that there was a positive correlation between colonization of the xylem by the hrp mutant and the level of control of WT R. solanacearum. As a result of previous studies showing that nonpathogenic strains of X. perforans only provide low levels of biological control (18), we hypothesized that using an attenuated pathogenic bacteriocin-producing strain of X. perforans rather than a nonpathogenic strain may increase the efficiency of control under field conditions.In this study, our strategy was to use an attenuated mutant of X. perforans that colonizes leaf tissue more effectively than nonpathogenic strains do and potentially provides more effective colonization and increases the likelihood for interaction between X. perforans and X. euvesicatoria. We selected strain 91-118ΔopgHΔbcnB as the biocontrol agent since it was previously shown that deletion of the osmoregulated periplasmic glucan gene opgH resulted in a pathogenic phenotype with a significantly reduced ability to cause disease and internal colonization in susceptible tomato tissue (22). The selected mutant also lacked BcnB activity based on a previous study in which BcnB appeared to negatively affect competitive ability in that a ΔbcnB mutant was more effective at colonizing tomato leaves in field experiments than WT X. perforans was (9).