Diversifying Incomes and Losing Landscape Complexity in Quilombola Shifting Cultivation Communities of the Atlantic Rainforest (Brazil) |
| |
Authors: | Cristina Adams Lucia Chamlian Munari Nathalie Van Vliet Rui Sergio Sereni Murrieta Barbara Ann Piperata Celia Futemma Nelson Novaes Pedroso Jr. Carolina Santos Taqueda Mirella Abrahão Crevelaro Vânia Luísa Spressola-Prado |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Laboratory of Human Ecology, Department of Environmental Management, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of S?o Paulo, Av. Arlindo Bétio, 1000, S?o Paulo, SP, Brazil, 03828-000 2. Laboratory of Human Evolutionary Studies, Department of Genetics and Evolutionary Biology, Biosciences Institute, University of S?o Paulo, R. do Mat?o, 277, S?o Paulo, SP, Brazil, 05508-090 3. Department of Geography and Geology, University of Copenhagen, Oster Voldgade 10, 1350, Copenhagen K, Denmark 4. Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, 4054 Smith Laboratory, 174 W. 18th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA 5. NEPAM - University of Campinas, Rua dos Flamboyants, 155, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas, SP, Brazil, 13083-867
|
| |
Abstract: | Shifting cultivation systems have been blamed as the primary cause of tropical deforestation and are being transformed through various forms of conservation and development policies and through the emergence of new markets for cash crops. Here, we analyze the outcomes of different policies on land use/land cover change (LUCC) in a traditional, shifting cultivation landscape in the Atlantic Forest (Brazil), one of the world’s top biodiversity hotspots. We also investigate the impacts of those policies on the environment and local livelihoods in Quilombola communities, which are formed by descendants of former Maroon colonies. Our findings show that conservation and social policies have had mixed effects both on the conservation of the Atlantic Forest and on the livelihoods of the Quilombola. We conclude that future interventions in the region need to build on the new, functional links between sustainable livelihoods and biodiversity, where less restrictive state policies leave room for new opportunities in self-organization and innovation. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|