Comparative performance of enzymatic and combined alkaline-enzymatic pretreatments on methane production from ensiled sorghum forage |
| |
Authors: | Manuela Rollini Cecilia Sambusiti Alida Musatti Elena Ficara Isabella Retinò Francesca Malpei |
| |
Institution: | 1. Università degli Studi di Milano, DeFENS, Section of Food Microbiology and Bioprocessing, Via Celoria 2, 20133, Milan, Italy 2. INRA, UMR 1208, IATE Ingenierie des Agropolymers et Technologies Emergentes, 2 Place Pierre Viala, 34060, Montpellier cedex, France 3. Politecnico di Milano, DICA, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Environmental Section, Piazza L. da Vinci 32, 20133, Milan, Italy
|
| |
Abstract: | This study investigated the effect of enzymatic and combined alkaline-enzymatic pretreatments on chemical composition and methane production from ensiled sorghum forage. Four commercial enzymatic preparations were tested and the two yielding the highest sugars release were added to evaluate any hydrolytic effect on both untreated and alkaline pretreated samples. In the combined alkaline-enzymatic pretreatment trials, the highest sugar release was found with Primafast and BGL preparations (added at a final concentration 0.12 and 0.20 mL/g TS, respectively), with a total monomeric content of 12 and 6.5 g/L. Fibre composition analysis confirmed that the combined alkaline-enzymatic pretreatment led to cellulose (up to 32 %) and hemicelluloses (up to 56 %) solubilisation, compared to the enzymatic pretreatment alone. BMP tests were performed on both untreated and pretreated samples, and time courses of methane production were fitted. Both enzymatic and combined alkaline-enzymatic pretreatment led to a methane production increase (304 and 362 mL CH4/g VS), compared to that of untreated sorghum (265 mL CH4/g VS), as +15 and +37 %, respectively. Moreover, higher specific methane production rates, compared to that of untreated sorghum (20.31 mL CH4/g VS/d), were obtained by applying the enzymatic and combined alkaline-enzymatic pretreatment (33.94 and 31.65 mL CH4/g VS/d), respectively. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|