| Abstract: | The anchorage mechanics of mature buttressed trees of Aglaiaand Nephelium, and of non-buttressed Mallotus wrayi have beeninvestigated by combining a study of the morphology of theirroot systems with a series of anchorage tests. Both types possessed tap roots, but only buttressed trees possessedsinker roots, which branched from the ends of the buttresses.The anchorage strength of the buttressed trees was almost double(10.6 kNm) that of the unbuttressed ones (4.9 kNm), and themaximum moment was generated at lower angles. In but tressedtrees, the leeward buttresses were pushed into the soil beforebending and eventually breaking towards their tip, whilst thewindward buttresses pulled out of the soil or delaminated ifthey possessed sinker roots. The tap root rotated in the soilto windward. In contrast, during failure of unbuttressed treesthe tap root both moved and bent towards the leeward, the windwardroots were pulled out of the soil, and the leeward lateralssimply buckled. Strains along but tresses were much higher thanalong the laterals of unbuttressed trees. These results suggest that buttresses act in both tension andcompression and make a much larger contribution to anchoragethan the thin laterals of non-buttressed trees. The relativecontribution of the but tresses was determined by carrying outa further series of anchorage tests in which both buttressedand unbuttressed trees were pulled over after all their lateralshad been cut away. These trees were therefore only anchoredby their taproot. Failure of both types was similar to intactunbuttressed trees, and they had similar anchorage strengthstoeach other, 4 kNm, around 80% of the value for intact non-buttressedtrees, but only 40% of the strength of intact buttressed trees.Buttresses therefore contribute around 60% of the anchorageof buttressed trees, producing around six times more anchoragethan the thin laterals of unbuttressed trees. Key words: Anchorage, root architecture, sinker roots, tap roots, root bending strength, buttresses |
