Evaluating hydrogen bond interactions in enzymes containing Mn(III)-histidine complexation using manganese-imidazole complexes

It is often difficult to control hydrogen bond interactions in small molecule compounds that model metalloenzyme active sites. The imidazole-containing ligands 4,5-dicarboxyimidazole (H(3)DCBI) and 4,5-dicarboxy- N-methylimidazole (H(2)MeDCBI) allow examination of the effects of internal hydrogen bonding between carboxylate and imidazole nitrogen atoms. A new series of mononuclear manganese imidazole complexes have been prepared using these ligands: Mn(III)(salpn)(H(2)DCBI)(DMF) (1), Mn(III)(salpn)(HMeDCBI) (2), Mn(III)(dtsalpn)(HMeDCBI) (3), [Mn(IV)(dtsalpn)(HMeDCBI)]PF(6) (4), Mn(III)(salpn)(H(2)DCBI) (5), Mn(III)(dtsalpn)(H(2)DCBI) (6), and Mn(IV)(dtsalpn)(H(2)DCBI)PF(6) (8). Complexes 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 have been prepared by direct reaction of salpn [salpn=(salicylideneaminato)-1,3-diaminopropane)] or dtsalpn [dtsalpn=(3,5-di- t-butylsalicylideneaminato)-1,3-diaminopropane)] and H(3)DCBI and H(2)MeDCBI with Mn(III) acetate, while complexes 4 and 8 were made by bulk electrolysis of complex 3 or 6 in dichloromethane. Complexes 1, 2, and 6 were characterized by X-ray diffraction. The impact of hydrogen bonding interactions of the complexes has been demonstrated by X-ray diffraction, cyclic voltammetry, and EPR spectroscopy. In all complexes the central metal ion is present in a six-coordinate geometry. Magnetic susceptibility measurements confirm the spin and oxidation states of the complexes. The cyclic voltammograms of 3 and 6 in dichloromethane reveal single, reversible redox waves with E(1/2)=600 mV and 690 mV, respectively. The X-band EPR spectrum of 4 shows a broad signal around g=4.4, and the corresponding complex 8 possesses a broad signal at slightly lower field ( g=5.5) than 4. These studies demonstrate that even small changes in the effective charge of the imidazole ligand can have a profound impact on the structure, spectroscopy, and magnetism of manganese(IV) complexes. We use these observations to present a model that may explain the origin of the g=4.1 signal in the S(2) state of photosystem II.