Hepatitis C virus infection from blood and blood products

Abstract: The addition of second-generation HCV epitopes in antibody detection assays has increased the sensitivity and specificity of blood donor testing, to prevent post-transfusion hepatitis non-A, non-B (PTH-NANB), later characterized as Hepatitis C. However, it is not clear whether all HCV infectious donors are detected by second generation anti-HCV testing. Prospective studies on PTH-NANB were left with some unresolved cases. The use of second-generation anti-HCV assays in blood banks presented a problem with a relatively large number of indeterminate reactivities in supplemental assays such as RIBA-2. These indeterminate reactivities may be solved by the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR is more and more used as an extra confirmatory assay to resolve RIBA indeterminate results on blood donors. However, a European study on the proficiency of HCV PCR in different countries revealed that only a minority of the reference laboratories perform this test faultness. Lately, third generation RIBA was developed, which was originally designed to resolve RIBA-2 indeterminate cases. RIBA-3 was shown to be more sensitive and specific in early HCV infection and blood donors than RIBA-2. Third generation anti-HCV testing will become standard practice. Some questions, however, remain unanswered. Do we miss any rare HCV infectious donors, of other genotypes, with third-generation assays, based only on the type 1 sequence of HCV? Can we improve HCV detection in the early phase of infection? What is the role of sporadic HCV transmission? How can we standardize HCV nucleic acid detection methods?