首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Medieval monastic mortality: Hazard analysis of mortality differences between monastic and nonmonastic cemeteries in England
Authors:Sharon N DeWitte  Jessica C Boulware  Rebecca C Redfern
Institution:1. Department of Anthropology, University of South Carolina, , Columbia, SC, 29208;2. Centre for Human Bioarchaeology, Museum of London, 150 London Wall, , London, EC2Y 5HN UK
Abstract:Scholarship on life in medieval European monasteries has revealed a variety of factors that potentially affected mortality in these communities. Though there is some evidence based on age‐at‐death distributions from England that monastic males lived longer than members of the general public, what is missing from the literature is an explicit examination of how the risks of mortality within medieval monastic settings differed from those within contemporaneous lay populations. This study examines differences in the hazard of mortality for adult males between monastic cemeteries (n = 528) and non‐monastic cemeteries (n = 368) from London, all of which date to between AD 1050 and 1540. Age‐at‐death data from all cemeteries are pooled to estimate the Gompertz hazard of mortality, and “monastic” (i.e., buried in a monastic cemetery) is modeled as a covariate affecting this baseline hazard. The estimated effect of the monastic covariate is negative, suggesting that individuals in the monastic communities faced reduced risks of dying compared to their peers in the lay communities. These results suggest better diets, the positive health benefits of religious behavior, better living conditions in general in monasteries, or selective recruitment of healthy or higher socioeconomic status individuals. Am J Phys Anthropol 152:322–332, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords:Gompertz hazard  religion and health  paleodemography  Medieval
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号