Control of Hypocotyl Hook Angle in Phaseolus mungo L. Role of Growth Substances

Effects of growth hormones on the hook angle and light responseof Phaseolus mungo L. hypocotyl hooks are described and theresults are discussed with reference to the functions of otherparts of the seedling in controlling the growth and shape ofthe hook. Apically applied IAA (indolyl acetic acid) prevented hook openingin decapitated seedlings in the dark and in all the red-irradiatedseedlings. ¹⁴C]IAA experiments showed that only a small quantityof IAA (2–6 ?g per hook) was required to produce theseeffects, and that transport of IAA through the hook was negligibleand unaffected by red irradiation. ABA (abscisic acid) had little effect on the hooks or theirlight response. Applied ethylene and IAA-induced ethylene slightly closed thehooks, but only slightly reduced light-induced opening. IAAreduced the effect of ethylene in the dark, but after irradiationthe hooks appeared more sensitive to the ethylene in the presenceof IAA, resulting in light-induced hook closure. Basally applied kinetin (6-furfurylaminopurine) prevented decapitatedhooks from opening in the dark, especially when GA₃ (gibberellicacid) was also present. Some combinations of kinetin and GA₃(with high kinetin concentrations) also prevented light-inducedopening, but combinations with lower kinetin concentrationsallowed almost as much opening as was found in intact hooks. It is proposed that the terminal parts act by regulating thesupply of cytokinins and gibberellins from the basal parts,and that IAA does not mediate this funotion in this species. The results are compared with those reported for other species.