Exaggerated Intergroup Bias in Economical Decision Making Games: Differential Effects of Primary and Secondary Psychopathic Traits |
| |
| Authors: | Steven M. Gillespie Ian J. Mitchell Ian Johnson Ellen Dawson Anthony R. Beech |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Centre for Forensic and Criminological Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.; 2. School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.; Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary, |
| |
| Abstract: | Psychopathic personality traits are linked with selfish and non-cooperative responses during economical decision making games. However, the possibility that these responses may vary when responding to members of the in-group and the out-group has not yet been explored. We aimed to examine the effects of primary (selfish, uncaring) and secondary (impulsive, irresponsible) psychopathic personality traits on the responses of non-offending participants to the in-group and the out-group (defined in terms of affiliation to a UK University) across a series of economical decision making games. We asked a total of 60 participants to act as the proposer in both the dictator game and the ultimatum game. We found that across both tasks, those who scored highly for secondary psychopathic traits showed an elevated intergroup bias, making more generous offers toward members of the in-group relative to the out-group. An exaggerated intergroup bias may therefore represent a motivational factor for the antisocial behavior of those with elevated secondary psychopathic traits. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
