首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Possible Links Between Stress Defense and the Tricarboxylic Acid (TCA) Cycle in Francisella Pathogenesis
Authors:Jennifer Dieppedale  Gael Gesbert  Elodie Ramond  Cerina Chhuon  Iharilalao Dubail  Marion Dupuis  Ida Chiara Guerrera  Alain Charbit
Institution:From the ‡Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Bâtiment Leriche. 96 rue Didot 75993 Paris Cedex 14 – France; ;§INSERM, U1002, Unité de Pathogénie des Infections Systémiques, Paris, France; ;¶Plateau Protéome Necker, PPN, IFR94, Université Paris-Descartes, Faculté de Médecine René Descartes, Paris 75015 France
Abstract:Francisella tularensis is a highly infectious bacterium causing the zoonotic disease tularemia. In vivo, this facultative intracellular bacterium survives and replicates mainly in the cytoplasm of infected cells. We have recently identified a genetic locus, designated moxR that is important for stress resistance and intramacrophage survival of F. tularensis. In the present work, we used tandem affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry to identify in vivo interacting partners of three proteins encoded by this locus: the MoxR-like ATPase (FTL_0200), and two proteins containing motifs predicted to be involved in protein–protein interactions, bearing von Willebrand A (FTL_0201) and tetratricopeptide (FTL_0205) motifs. The three proteins were designated here for simplification, MoxR, VWA1, and TPR1, respectively. MoxR interacted with 31 proteins, including various enzymes. VWA1 interacted with fewer proteins, but these included the E2 component of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase and TPR1. The protein TPR1 interacted with one hundred proteins, including the E1 and E2 subunits of both oxoglutarate and pyruvate dehydrogenase enzyme complexes, and their common E3 subunit. Remarkably, chromosomal deletion of either moxR or tpr1 impaired pyruvate dehydrogenase and oxoglutarate dehydrogenase activities, supporting the hypothesis of a functional role for the interaction of MoxR and TPR1 with these complexes. Altogether, this work highlights possible links between stress resistance and metabolism in F. tularensis virulence.Francisella tularensis is responsible for the disease tularamia in a large number of animal species. This highly infectious bacterial pathogen can be transmitted to humans in numerous ways (1, 2, 3), including direct contact with sick animals, inhalation, ingestion of contaminated water or food, or by bites from ticks, mosquitoes, or flies. Four different subspecies (subsp.) of F. tularensis that differ in virulence and geographic distribution exist, designated subsp. tularensis (type A), subsp. holarctica (type B), subsp. Novicida, and subsp. mediasiatica, respectively. F. tularensis subsp. tularensis is the most virulent subspecies causing a severe disease in humans, whereas F. tularensis subsp. holarctica causes a similar disease but of less severity (4). Because of its high infectivity and lethality, F. tularensis is considered a potential bioterrorism agent (5).F. tularensis is able to survive and to replicate in the cytoplasm of a variety of infected cells, including macrophages. To resist this stressful environment, the bacterium must have developed stress resistance mechanisms, most of which are not yet well characterized. We recently reported the identification of a novel genetic locus that is important for stress resistance and intracellular survival of F. tularensis (6). This locus was designated moxR because the first gene FTL_0200, encodes a protein belonging to the AAA+ ATPase of the MoxR family ((7) and references therein). The data obtained in that first study had led us to suggest that the F. tularensis MoxR-like protein might constitute, in combination with other proteins of the locus, a chaperone complex contributing to F. tularensis pathogenesis.To further validate this hypothesis and expand our initial observations, we here decided to perform tandem affinity purification (TAP),1 using a dual affinity tag approach coupled to mass spectroscopy analyses (8), to identify proteins interacting in vivo with three proteins encoded by the proximal portion of the moxR locus. For this, we chose as baits: the MoxR-like protein (FTL_0200) and two proteins bearing distinct motifs possibly involved in protein–protein interactions, FTL_0201 (Von Willebrand Factor Type A domain, or VWA) and FTL_0205 (tetratrichopeptide repeat or TPR). The three proteins were designated here for simplification, MoxR, VWA1, and TPR1; and the corresponding genes moxR, vwa1, and tpr1, respectively.VWA domains are present in all three kingdoms of life. They consist of a β-sheet sandwiched by multiple α helices. Frequently, VWA domain-containing proteins function in multiprotein complexes (9). TPR typically contain 34 amino acids. Many three-dimensional structures of TPR domains have been solved, revealing amphipathic helical structures (10). TPR-containing proteins are also found in all kingdoms of life. They can be involved in a variety of functions, and generally mediate protein–protein interactions. In the past few years, several TPR-related proteins have been shown to be involved in virulence mechanisms in pathogenic bacteria ((11) and references therein).Our proteomic approach allowed us to identify a series of protein interactants for each of the three moxR-encoded proteins. Remarkably, the protein TPR1 interacted with all the subunits of the pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) and 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (OGDH) complexes. Furthermore, inactivation of tpr1 also severely impaired the activities of these two enzymes. Inactivation of tpr1 affected bacterial resistance to several stresses (and in particular oxidative stress), intramacrophagic bacterial multiplication and bacterial virulence in the mouse model. Functional implications and possible relationship between bacterial metabolism, stress defense, and bacterial virulence are discussed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号