首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Host selection behavior of a thistle-feeding fly: choices and consequences
Authors:R. G. Lalonde  B. D. Roitberg
Affiliation:(1) Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, V5A 1S6 Burnaby, B.C., Canada;(2) Center for Population Biology, Zoology Department, University of California at Davis, 95616 Davis, CA, USA
Abstract:Summary Female Canada thistle seed flies (Orellia ruficauda) preferentially oviposit into seed heads which are a single day from opening. When flies are forced to oviposit into flower heads at other stages of development, offspring typically do slightly poorer: they attain a mature mass of about 15% less than do larvae derived from preferred hosts. Larval mass correlates strongly with reproductive success: heavy larvae develop into adults that produce eggs at a faster rate than do those developing from small larvae. After laying a clutch of eggs, flies circumscribe the rim of the flowerhead with their extended ovipositor and deposit a clear fluid. Flies reject previously-attacked hosts, bearing this apparent marking pheromone, significantly more often than they reject unattacked hosts. Costs of superparasitism in this system are relatively small, inasmuch as there is only a weak relationship between clutch size and larval success at the densities measured in this study. We speculate that flies are highly selective, when the apparent costs of making a mistake are rather low, because the information provided by phenological cues and by the putative marking pheromone is highly reliable, and low fecundity and time costs allow sufficient time to express a high level of discrimination.
Keywords:Host selection  Marking  Superparasitism  Fecundity
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号