In Vivo Tumor Growth Rate Measured by US in Preoperative Period and Long Term Disease Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients |
| |
Authors: | Tae-Kyung Yoo Jun Won Min Min Kyoon Kim Eunshin Lee Jongjin Kim Han-Byoel Lee Young Joon Kang Yun-Gyoung Kim Hyeong-Gon Moon Woo Kyung Moon Nariya Cho Dong-Young Noh Wonshik Han |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.; 2. Department of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.; 3. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.; 4. Laboratory of Breast Cancer Biology, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, UNITED STATES, |
| |
Abstract: | ObjectiveThe aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of tumor growth rate, calculated from tumor size measurements by US, on breast cancer patients’ outcome.Patients and MethodsBreast cancer patients who received at least two serial breast ultrasonographies (US) in our institution during preoperative period and were surgically treated between 2002 and 2010 were reviewed. Tumor growth rate was determined by specific growth rate (SGR) using the two time point tumor sizes by US.ResultsA total of 957 patients were analyzed. The median duration between initial and second US was 28 days (range, 8–140). The median initial tumor size was 1.7cm (range, 0.4–7.0) and median second size was 1.9cm (range, 0.3–7.2). 523(54.6%) cases had increase in size. The median SGR(x10-2) was 0.59 (range, -11.90~31.49) and mean tumor doubling time was 14.51 days. Tumor growth rate was higher when initial tumor size was smaller. Lymphovascular invasion, axillary lymph node metastasis, and higher histologic grade were significantly associated with higher SGR. SGR was significantly associated with disease-free survival (DFS) in a univariate analysis (p = 0.04), but not in a multivariate Cox analysis (p>0.05). High SGR was significantly associated with worse DFS in a subgroup of initial tumor size >2cm (p = 0.018), but not in those with tumor size <2cm (p>0.05).ConclusionOur results showed that tumor growth rate measured by US in a relatively short time interval was associated with other worse prognostic factors and DFS, but it was not an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer patients. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|