首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Significance of Isolated Positive IgM Serologic Results by Enzyme Immunoassay for Coccidioidomycosis
Authors:Janis E. Blair  Jeremiah T. Currier
Affiliation:(1) Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA;(2) Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
Abstract:Serologic testing is important for diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis. Many methods are available for diagnostic testing. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) can be performed quickly and locally but has the potential for false-positive results in patients manifesting a positive EIA for immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies and a negative EIA for immunoglobulin G (IgG). We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 405 patients with coccidioidal serologic testing performed between 1999 and 2003. Of 706 EIAs, 37 (5%) produced test results for 28 patients that showed isolated IgM positivity. Among these 28 patients, 24 (86%) had positive serologic findings by other methods (complement fixation or immunodiffusion or both), and 7 (25%) had positive microbiologic or histopathologic findings. All 4 (14%) patients without other positive serologic results had diagnostic tests with positive microbiologic or histopathologic results. No false-positive IgM assays were observed. We conclude that the false-positive rate of the EIA IgM is low, and that an isolated positive EIA IgM should prompt further follow-up and diagnostic testing. J. T. Currier was a Visiting Research Trainee at the Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Keywords:Coccidioides   Immunoenzyme techniques  False-positive reactions  Predictive value of tests
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号