Purpose of ReviewResistance to antifungal drugs amongst Candida species is a growing concern, and azole resistance may be emerging in Cryptococcus species. This review provides a contemporary perspective, relevant to the clinical mycology laboratory, of antifungal susceptibility testing of these fungi, focussing on the challenges of phenotypic and genotypic methodologies to detect drug resistance.Recent FindingsStandardised CLSI and EUCAST broth microdilution (BMD) susceptibility testing methods are the benchmark to determine clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and/or epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) MICs for Candida and Cryptococcus spp. Commercial methods may be used but caution is required when employing BMD CBPs/ECVs to interpret results. Species-specific CBPs/ECVs for Candida spp. generally correlate well with predicting likelihood of therapeutic failure or of presence of a drug resistance mechanism with the exception of the echinocandins where the presence of specific FKS gene mutations and not the MIC correlates most accurately with clinical outcome. The relationship of presence of one or more mechanisms of azole resistance and drug MICs is uncertain. Next generation sequencing technology is offering insights into the relationships between susceptibility results obtained by phenotypic and genotypic methods. For Cryptococcus spp., CBPs are not established but species- and genetic type-specific EVCs are useful for guiding therapy where clinically indicated. Isolates of genotype VGII appear to exhibit the highest MICs.SummaryAntifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts is important to detect drug resistance. For Candida spp., MICs have clinical utility for the azoles but detecting echinocandin resistance by genotypic methods is preferred. For Cryptococcus spp., ECVs are useful in guiding therapy. |
