首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Phylogeny and biogeography of the genus Cephalenchus (Tylenchomorpha,Nematoda)
Authors:Tiago J Pereira  Xue Qing  Kuei‐Fu Chang  Manuel Mundo‐Ocampo  Juvenil E Cares  Erik J Ragsdale  Chau N Nguyen  James G Baldwin
Institution:1. Department of Nematology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA;2. CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education from Brazil, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil;3. Research Group Nematology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium;4. Departmento de Fitopatologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil;5. Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA;6. Department of Nematology, Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
Abstract:The phylogenetic position of Cephalenchus is enigmatic with respect to other tylench nematodes. In this study, Cephalenchus populations representing 11 nominal species were sampled worldwide for molecular and morphological characterization. Species identification was based on light microscopy (LM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Molecular analyses were based on the genes (i.e. 18S, 28S, 5.8S) and internal transcribed spacers (ITS‐1 and ITS‐2) of the ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Phylogenetic analyses (i.e. full and reduced alignments) of either concatenated or single genes always supported the monophyly of Cephalenchus. A sister relationship between Cephalenchus and Eutylenchus excretorius was recovered by most analyses, although branch support varies depending on the dataset used. The position of Cephalenchus + E. excretorius within Tylenchomorpha nevertheless remains ambiguous, thus highlighting the importance of sampling additional genes as well as taxa. Placement of Cephalenchus + E. excretorius as sister of Tylenchinae or Boleodorinae could not be rejected on the basis of 18S and 28S rRNA genes. Within Cephalenchus, amphidial opening morphology shows congruence with molecular‐based phylogenetic relationships, whereas the number of lines in the lateral field is likely to be a convergent trait. Morphometric analyses clearly distinguished short tail from medium–long tail species, and SEM observations seem to suggest a relation between tail length and amphidial opening. In addition, molecular phylogenies support the non‐monophyly of Cephalenchus cephalodiscus, Cephalenchus cylindricus, Cephalenchus daisuce and Cephalenchus leptus. The known extent of Cephalenchus diversity is increased with the inclusion of two new species, and the biogeography of the genus is discussed.
Keywords:
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号