A test of the risk allocation hypothesis: tadpole responses to temporal change in predation risk

The risk allocation hypothesis predicts that temporal variationin predation risk can influence how animals allocate feedingbehavior among situations that differ in danger. We testedthe risk allocation model with tadpoles of the frog Rana lessonae,which satisfy the main assumptions of this model because theymust feed to reach metamorphosis within a single season, theirbehavioral defense against predators is costly, and they canrespond to changes in risk integrated over time. Our experimentswitched tadpoles between artificial ponds with different numbersof caged dragonfly larvae and held them at high and low riskfor different portions of their lives. Tadpoles responded stronglyto predators, but they did not obey the risk allocation hypothesis:as the high-risk environment became more dangerous, there wasno tendency for tadpoles to allocate more feeding to the low-riskenvironment, and as tadpoles spent more time at risk, they didnot increase feeding in both environments. Our results suggestthat the model might be more applicable when the time spentunder high predation risk is large relative to the time requiredto collect resources.