Transient changes in transpiration, and stem and soil CO2 efflux in longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) following fire-induced leaf area reduction |
| |
Authors: | Barton D Clinton Chris A Maier Chelcy R Ford Robert J Mitchell |
| |
Institution: | (1) Southern Research Station, Coweeta Hydrologic Lab, USDA Forest Service, 3160 Coweeta Lab Road, Otto, NC 28763, USA;(2) Southern Research Station, Research Triangle Park, USDA Forest Service, RTP, NC, USA;(3) Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center, Newton, GA, USA |
| |
Abstract: | In 20-year-old longleaf pine, we examined short-term effects of reduced live leaf area (A
L) via canopy scorching on sap flow (Q; kg H2O h−1), transpiration per unit leaf area (E
L; mm day−1), stem CO2 efflux (R
stem; μmol m−2 s−1) and soil CO2 efflux (R
soil; μmol m−2 s−1) over a 2-week period during early summer. R
stem and Q were measured at two positions (1.3-m or BH, and base of live crown—BLC), and R
soil was measured using 15 open-system chambers on each plot. E
L before and after treatment was estimated using Q measured at BLC with estimates of A
L before and after scorching. We expected Q to decrease in scorched trees compared with controls resulting from reduced A
L. We expected R
stem at BLC and BH and R
soil to decrease following scorching due to reduced leaf area, which would decrease carbon supply to the stem and roots. Scorching
reduced A
L by 77%. Prior to scorching, Q at BH was similar between scorch and control trees. Following scorching, Q was not different between control and scorch trees; however, E
L increased immediately following scorching by 3.5-fold compared to control trees. Changes in E
L in scorched trees corresponded well with changes in VPD (D), whereas control trees appeared more decoupled over the 5-day period following treatment. By the end of the study, R
stem decreased to 15–25% in scorched trees at both stem positions compared to control trees. Last, we found that scorching resulted
in a delayed and temporary increase in R
soil rather than a decrease. No change in Q and increased E
L following scorching indicates a substantial adjustment in stomatal conductance in scorched trees. Divergence in R
stem between scorch and control trees suggests a gradual decline in stem carbohydrates following scorching. The absence of a strong
R
soil response is likely due to non-limiting supplies of root starch during early summer. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|