The relative lability of floral vs. non-floral characters and a morphological phylogenetic analysis of Cobaea (Polemoniaceae)

The relative levels of lability in floral vs. vegetative characters have been suggested to give insight into the mechanisms of adaptation and speciation. Cobaea (Polemoniaceae) exhibits a remarkable diversity in floral form. A morphology-based phylogeny was constructed and is congruent in most regards with a previously published molecular phylogeny, but significant incongruence was found in the placement of two taxa. A combined analysis was performed, excluding C. aquatoriensis and C. lutea, and was nearly identical to the molecular analysis. The phylogenies are compatible with a recently published classification. Incongruencies between the phylogenies within section Rosenbergia may have profound implications for floral evolution. A simple method for testing the levels of homoplasy, as an indicator of lability between two classes of data, is developed and used to test for differences between floral and non-floral classes of characters. The method is based on repeated randomization of the data into partitions and recalculation of a test statistic defined as the difference between consistency index (CI) values of the data in each partition over a given tree. The null hypothesis that the floral characters are no more homoplasious than the non-floral characters cannot be rejected (P=0.09).