首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Implementation fidelity trajectories of a health promotion program in multidisciplinary settings: managing tensions in rehabilitation care
Authors:Femke Hoekstra  Marjolein A. G. van Offenbeek  Rienk Dekker  Florentina J. Hettinga  Trynke Hoekstra  Lucas H. V. van der Woude  Cees P. van der Schans  ReSpAct group
Affiliation:1.Center for Human Movement Sciences,University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen,Groningen,The Netherlands;2.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation,University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen,Groningen,The Netherlands;3.Healthwise, Faculty of Economics and Business,University of Groningen,Groningen,The Netherlands;4.Center for Sports Medicine,University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen,Groningen,The Netherlands;5.School of Biological Sciences, Center of Sport and Exercise Science,University of Essex,Colchester,UK;6.Research Group Healthy Ageing, Allied Health Care and Nursing,Hanze University of Applied Sciences,Groningen,The Netherlands;7.Department of Health Psychology,University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen,Groningen,The Netherlands
Abstract:

Background

Although the importance of evaluating implementation fidelity is acknowledged, little is known about heterogeneity in fidelity over time. This study aims to generate insight into the heterogeneity in implementation fidelity trajectories of a health promotion program in multidisciplinary settings and the relationship with changes in patients’ health behavior.

Methods

This study used longitudinal data from the nationwide implementation of an evidence-informed physical activity promotion program in Dutch rehabilitation care. Fidelity scores were calculated based on annual surveys filled in by involved professionals (n?=?±?70). Higher fidelity scores indicate a more complete implementation of the program’s core components. A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted on the implementation fidelity scores of 17 organizations at three different time points. Quantitative and qualitative data were used to explore organizational and professional differences between identified trajectories. Regression analyses were conducted to determine differences in patient outcomes.

Results

Three trajectories were identified as the following: ‘stable high fidelity’ (n?=?9), ‘moderate and improving fidelity’ (n?=?6), and ‘unstable fidelity’ (n?=?2). The stable high fidelity organizations were generally smaller, started earlier, and implemented the program in a more structured way compared to moderate and improving fidelity organizations. At the implementation period’s start and end, support from physicians and physiotherapists, professionals’ appreciation, and program compatibility were rated more positively by professionals working in stable high fidelity organizations as compared to the moderate and improving fidelity organizations (p?β?=???651.6, t(613)?=???1032, p?=?.303).

Conclusions

Differences in organizational-level implementation fidelity trajectories did not result in outcome differences at patient-level. This suggests that an effective implementation fidelity trajectory is contingent on the local organization’s conditions. More specifically, achieving stable high implementation fidelity required the management of tensions: realizing a localized change vision, while safeguarding the program’s standardized core components and engaging the scarce physicians throughout the process. When scaling up evidence-informed health promotion programs, we propose to tailor the management of implementation tensions to local organizations’ starting position, size, and circumstances.

Trial registration

The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3961. Registered 18 April 2013.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号