Fumarate dissimilation and differential reductant flow by Clostridium formicoaceticum and Clostridium aceticum

Methanol and the O-methyl group of vanillate did not support the growth of Clostridium formicoaceticum in defined medium under CO₂-limited conditions; however, they were growth supportive when fumarate was provided concomitantly. Fumarate alone was not growth supportive under these conditions. Fumarate reduction (dissimilation) to succinate was the predominant electron-accepting, energy-conserving process for methanol-derived reductant under CO₂-limited conditions. However, when both reductant sinks, i.e., fumarate and CO₂, were available, reductant was redirected towards CO₂ in defined medium. In contrast, in undefined medium with both reductant sinks available, C. formicoaceticum simultaneously engaged fumarate dismutation and the concomitant usage of CO₂ and fumarate as reductant sinks. With Clostridium aceticum, fumarate also substituted for CO₂, and H₂ became growth supportive under CO₂-limited conditions. Fumarate dissimilation was the predominant electron-accepting process under CO₂-limited conditions; however, when both reductant sinks were available, H₂-derived reductant was routed towards CO₂, indicating that acetogenesis was the preferred electron-accepting process when reductant flow originated from H₂. Collectively, these findings indicate that fumarate dissimilation, not dismutation, is selectively used under certain conditions and that such usage of fumarate is subject to complex regulation.