Summation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Effects of amounts,number of wells,and finer ratios

Research conducted by Rumbaugh, Savage-Rumbaugh, and Hegel (1987) demonstrated that chimpanzees, presented with two pairs of quantities of chocolate chips, were capable of combining noncontiguous areas in order to choose the pair that contained the greater quantity. Further research (Rumbaugh, Savage-Rumbaugh, and Pate, 1988) showed that this ability is not based on the avoidance of the pair containing the smallest single amount or selection of the pair containing the largest single amount. In the experiments in the present sutdy, the influence of wells containing zero or one chocolate on summation and the consequences of eliminating the requirement to sum noncontiguous areas by interpersing trials in which only two (rather than four) food wells were investigated. It was found that summation of quantities occurred regardless whether food wells containing zero or one were present. Also, the chimpanzees performed significantly better on two-well trials than on four-well trials, thereby suggesting that they were not simply discounting the space between the wells on four-well trials but, instead, were employing a combinatorial process which we call summation.