Structural behaviour and strain distribution of the long bones of the human lower limbs |
| |
Authors: | Luca Cristofolini Giorgia Conti Mateusz Juszczyk Sara Cremonini Serge Van Sint Jan Marco Viceconti |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK;2. School of Sport, Exercise and Health Science, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK;3. Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK;1. μVIS X-ray Imaging Centre, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ Southampton, UK;2. Bioengineering Sciences Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ Southampton, UK;3. Institute for Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria;1. Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, USA;2. Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Although stiffness and strength of lower limb bones have been investigated in the past, information is not complete. While the femur has been extensively investigated, little information is available about the strain distribution in the tibia, and the fibula has not been tested in vitro. This study aimed at improving the understanding of the biomechanics of lower limb bones by: (i) measuring the stiffness and strain distributions of the different low limb bones; (ii) assessing the effect of viscoelasticity in whole bones within a physiological range of strain-rates; (iii) assessing the difference in the behaviour in relation to opposite directions of bending and torsion. The structural stiffness and strain distribution of paired femurs, tibias and fibulas from two donors were measured. Each region investigated of each bone was instrumented with 8–16 triaxial strain gauges (over 600 grids in total). Each bone was subjected to 6–12 different loading configurations. Tests were replicated at two different loading speeds covering the physiological range of strain-rates. Viscoelasticity did not have any pronounced effect on the structural stiffness and strain distribution, in the physiological range of loading rates explored in this study. The stiffness and strain distribution varied greatly between bone segments, but also between directions of loading. Different stiffness and strain distributions were observed when opposite directions of torque or opposite directions of bending (in the same plane) were applied. To our knowledge, this study represents the most extensive collection of whole-bone biomechanical properties of lower limb bones. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|