首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


The effect of positioning on the biomechanical performance of soft shell hip protectors
Authors:WJ Choi  JA Hoffer  SN Robinovitch
Institution:1. Injury Prevention and Mobility Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6;2. Neurokinesiology Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada;3. School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada;1. Brooke Army Medical Center/San Antonio Military Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, Fort Sam, Houston, TX 78234, USA;2. United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3400 Rawley E Chambers Ave, Fort Sam, Houston, TX 78234, USA;3. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA;1. Epidemiology Coordinating and Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada;2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Abstract:Wearable hip protectors represent a promising strategy for reducing risk for hip fracture from a sideways fall. However, small changes in pad positioning may influence their protective benefit. Using a mechanical hip impact simulator, we investigated how three marketed soft shell hip protectors attenuate and redistribute the impact force applied to the hip, and how this depends on displacement from their intended position by 2.5 or 5 cm superiorly, posteriorly, inferiorly or anteriorly. For centrally-placed protectors, peak pressure was reduced 93% below the unpadded value by a 16 mm horseshoe-shaped protector, 93% by a 14 mm horseshoe protector, and 94% by a 16 mm continuous protector. In unpadded trials, 83% of the total force was applied to the skin overlying the proximal femur (danger zone). This was lowered to 19% by the centrally placed 16 mm horseshoe protector, to 34% by the 14 mm horseshoe, and to 40% by the 16 mm continuous protector. Corresponding reductions in peak force delivered to the femoral neck (relative to unpadded) were 45%, 38%, and 20%, respectively. The protective benefit of all three protectors decreased with pad displacement. For example, displacement of protectors by 5 cm anteriorly caused peak femoral neck force to increase 60% above centrally-placed values, and approach unpadded values. These results indicate that soft shell hip protectors provide substantial protective benefits, but decline in performance with small displacements from their intended position. Our findings confirm the need for correct and stable positioning of hip protectors in garment design.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号