Assessment of Bias Associated with Incomplete Extraction of Microbial DNA from Soil

DNA extraction bias is a frequently cited but poorly understood limitation of molecular characterizations of environmental microbial communities. To assess the bias of a commonly used soil DNA extraction kit, we varied the cell lysis protocol and conducted multiple extractions on subsamples of clay, sand, and organic soils. DNA, as well as bacterial and fungal ribosomal gene copies as measured by quantitative PCR, continued to be isolated in successive extractions. When terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism was used, a significant shift in community composition due to extraction bias was detected for bacteria but not for fungi. Pyrosequencing indicated that the relative abundances of sequences from rarely cultivated groups such as Acidobacteria, Gemmatimonades, and Verrucomicrobia were higher in the first extraction than in the sixth but that the reverse was true for Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. This suggests that the well-known phylum-level bacterial cultivation bias may be partially exaggerated by DNA extraction bias. We conclude that bias can be adequately reduced in many situations by pooling three successive extractions, and additional measures should be considered when divergent soil types are compared or when comprehensive community analysis is necessary.The vast majority of soil bacteria (1, 7, 27) and fungi (13, 29) cannot be cultured via traditional laboratory techniques and must be identified using molecular methods. Successful characterization of microbial communities is therefore often dependent on DNA that is extracted from the environment. However, extraction of high-quality DNA from soil can be problematic (8, 11, 22, 26). Commercial DNA extraction kits are now commonly used in the assessment of taxonomic and functional diversity, community composition, and population abundance (e.g., references 19, 21, 23, 25, and 31). Studies comparing various kits (18, 32) or comparing commercial kits to other methods (2, 10, 24) have shown that DNA yield and purity vary depending on methodology and soil type. While these comparative studies are valuable, it is still unclear to what extent these protocols yield genomic DNA representative of the microbial community found within soil.Our objective in this study was to optimize and assess the bias of a widely used commercial soil DNA extraction kit. We hypothesized that cell lysis would be enhanced and DNA would be removed from adsorption sites by conducting multiple extractions on a single sample, thereby increasing genomic DNA yield and obtaining a more complete survey of microbial taxa. This hypothesis was tested by (i) varying the extraction protocol and measuring DNA yield for three soils with differing characteristics and (ii) examining extraction bias in the genomic DNA obtained from successive extractions by using an improved method. Analytical replicates rather than biological replicates were used in order to focus strictly on variation and bias introduced through methodology, although multiple soil types were analyzed to determine whether biases detected were consistent.