Pyrosequencing-Based Assessment of Soil pH as a Predictor of Soil Bacterial Community Structure at the Continental Scale

Soils harbor enormously diverse bacterial populations, and soil bacterial communities can vary greatly in composition across space. However, our understanding of the specific changes in soil bacterial community structure that occur across larger spatial scales is limited because most previous work has focused on either surveying a relatively small number of soils in detail or analyzing a larger number of soils with techniques that provide little detail about the phylogenetic structure of the bacterial communities. Here we used a bar-coded pyrosequencing technique to characterize bacterial communities in 88 soils from across North and South America, obtaining an average of 1,501 sequences per soil. We found that overall bacterial community composition, as measured by pairwise UniFrac distances, was significantly correlated with differences in soil pH (r = 0.79), largely driven by changes in the relative abundances of Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes across the range of soil pHs. In addition, soil pH explains a significant portion of the variability associated with observed changes in the phylogenetic structure within each dominant lineage. The overall phylogenetic diversity of the bacterial communities was also correlated with soil pH (R² = 0.50), with peak diversity in soils with near-neutral pHs. Together, these results suggest that the structure of soil bacterial communities is predictable, to some degree, across larger spatial scales, and the effect of soil pH on bacterial community composition is evident at even relatively coarse levels of taxonomic resolution.The biogeographical patterns exhibited by microbial communities have been examined in a wide range of environments, and studies focusing on microbial biogeography continue to be published at a rapid pace. We know that microbial community diversity and composition can vary considerably across space, and this variation is theorized to be linked to changes in a number of biotic or abiotic factors (22, 36, 41). There are numerous overarching reasons for this interest in understanding microbial biogeography. For example, comparing microbial patterns to those commonly observed in plant and animal taxa is of intense theoretical interest (22, 25). From a more practical standpoint, studies of microbial biogeography can often provide key insights into the physiologies, environmental tolerances, and ecological strategies of microbial taxa, particularly those difficult-to-culture taxa that often dominate in natural environments. However, perhaps the most important rationale for studying microbial biogeography is the most basic one: microbes are diverse, ubiquitous, and abundant, yet their biogeographical patterns and the factors driving these spatial patterns often remain poorly understood.No single biogeographical pattern is shared by all microorganisms, just as there is no single biogeographical pattern followed by all “macrobial” (i.e., plant and animal) communities (31). The specific biogeographical patterns exhibited by microorganisms are variable and highly dependent on a number of factors, including the taxonomic group in question (29), the degree of phylogenetic resolution at which the communities are examined (e.g., Pseudomonas) (7), and the spatial scale of the study (40). However, some common patterns emerge if we specifically examine the biogeography of soil microorganisms. In particular, the structure and diversity of soil bacterial communities have been found to be closely related to soil environmental characteristics (5, 37, 47), and soil pH is often correlated with the observed biogeographical patterns (19, 24). However, due to the paucity of detailed and comprehensive studies of soil bacterial biogeography, particularly across larger spatial scales, our understanding of soil microbial biogeography remains incomplete.Previous studies of soil bacterial biogeography have focused on either surveying a few soils in detail or surveying a larger number of soils by techniques that offer less detailed phylogenetic information. For example, a few recent studies used pyrosequencing or Sanger sequencing-based techniques to deeply survey the diversity and composition of the bacterial communities within a single soil or a few soils (1, 14, 20, 39, 42). Such studies are valuable in that they provide our best assessments of overall bacterial diversity and community structure and the relative abundances of specific bacterial taxa within soils. However, because such studies often examine only a limited number of soils, they do not allow for robust assessment of biogeographical patterns and the factors that may drive these patterns. Other studies have examined bacterial communities across a larger number of soils, using more limited techniques, such as fingerprinting methods that offer little specific phylogenetic information on bacterial community structure or techniques that describe communities at very coarse levels of taxonomic resolution (18, 19). A comprehensive assessment of the biogeographical patterns exhibited by soil bacterial communities requires both depth (individual communities surveyed at a reasonable level of phylogenetic detail) and breadth (examining a sufficiently large number of samples to assess spatial patterns). With the recent development of the bar-coded pyrosequencing technique (23), we need not sacrifice depth for breadth, or vice versa. This was demonstrated in several recent studies (2, 12, 17, 28) that used bar-coded pyrosequencing to simultaneously analyze relatively large numbers of individual samples, surveying the bacterial community in each sample to an extent that would be difficult (or prohibitively expensive) using standard cloning and Sanger sequencing techniques.Here we apply the bar-coded pyrosequencing technique to examine the structure and diversity of bacterial communities in 88 soils collected from across North and South America. This work expands on a previous fingerprinting-based survey of bacterial communities across a similar set of soils (19), using the pyrosequencing technique to extend the analyses and to answer the following questions. Which taxa are most abundant in soil? How does the phylogenetic structure of bacterial communities vary across the continental scale? Which environmental factors best predict bacterial community structure and diversity? Are some soil bacterial phyla more diverse than others?