Pig Manure Contamination Marker Selection Based on the Influence of Biological Treatment on the Dominant Fecal Microbial Groups

The objective of this study was to identify a microbial marker for pig manure contamination. We quantified the persistence of four dominant bacterial groups from the pig intestinal tract throughout manure handling at 10 livestock operations (including aerobic digestion) by using molecular typing. The partial 16S rRNA genes of Bacteroides-Prevotella, Eubacterium-Clostridiaceae, Bacillus-Streptococcus-Lactobacillus (BSL), and Bifidobacterium group isolates were amplified and analyzed by capillary electrophoresis single-strand conformation polymorphism. The most dominant bacterial populations were identified by cloning and sequencing their 16S rRNA genes. The results showed that Bifidobacterium spp. and, to a lesser extent, members of the BSL group, were less affected by the aerobic treatment than either Eubacterium-Clostridiaceae or Bacteroides-Prevotella. Two Bifidobacterium species found in raw manure were still present in manure during land application, suggesting that they can survive outside the pig intestinal tract and also survive aerobic treatment. The 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer of one species, Bifidobacterium thermacidophilum subsp. porcinum, was sequenced, and a specific pair of primers was designed for its detection in the environment. With this nested PCR assay, this potential marker was not detected in samples from 30 bovine, 30 poultry, and 28 human fecal samples or in 15 urban wastewater effluents. As it was detected in runoff waters after spreading of pig manure, we propose this marker as a suitable microbial indicator of pig manure contamination.Brittany represents only 7% of France but is the main pig production area and hosts approximately 14 million fatteners per year. This high concentration of confined pig feeding has led to the overapplication of manure to soil, which contributes to water pollution. Physical and biological manure treatment processes have been developed to limit nitrogen and phosphorus pollution (5). As these treatments were not designed to eliminate microbial pollution, even treated manure can contain pathogenic microorganisms (27) and agricultural soils and water systems can thus potentially still be contaminated through surface runoff and seepage. As manure application can increase the number of pathogens in the soil (18), pig feces may represent a significant risk to human health in Brittany. Currently, the monitoring of bacteria to assess fecal contamination (Escherichia coli, fecal coliforms, and enterococci) does not differentiate contamination from pig slurry from pollution by other animals or humans. It is thus important to develop analytic tools to specifically detect this source of pollution.Many studies have already proposed potential markers for the detection of host-specific fecal pollution (2, 3, 8, 12-15, 20, 37, 38, 48, 49). Much of this research has concentrated on distinguishing human and animal sources of contamination (3, 8, 20, 30, 38). Some studies have focused on identifying individual sources of animal pollution and have described molecular markers for feces from ducks (13), chickens (37), bovines (2, 3, 49), or cervids (6). Biomarkers have been proposed for porcine fecal contamination but rarely for porcine manure, the bacterial composition of which differs from that of porcine feces (9). Molecular markers have been developed to target the 16S rRNA gene sequences of dominant Eubacteria (2, 14, 43, 48) or methanogenic Archaebacteria (54) of the pig intestinal tract, whereas Khatib et al. (29) targeted the STII toxin gene from enterotoxigenic E. coli. Among the dominant groups of pig fecal Eubacteria, which include Bacteroides-Prevotella, Eubacterium-Clostridiacea, Lactobacillus-Streptococcus (34, 45, 51, 58), and to a lesser extent Bifidobacterium (40), the Bacteroides-Prevotella group has been particularly well studied (14, 22, 44). This marker of pig feces was described by Okabe et al. (44), but their work was based on feces sampled from only two farms and the number of clones analyzed was low. Gourmelon et al. (22) also detected the presence of a specific marker of pig feces belonging to the Bacteroides-Prevotella group in five stored manure samples. Although these studies revealed the presence of specific markers in fecal samples and in the subsequent pig manure samples, they did not address the possible disappearance of these anaerobic bacteria during the storage or biological treatment of the manure.Due to the lack of data concerning the bacterial flora of manure, the aims of this study were (i) to compare the monitoring of the Bacteroides-Prevotella group with that of Eubacterium-Clostridiaceae, Bacillus-Streptococcus-Lactobacillus (BSL), and Bifidobacterium throughout the biological manure treatment process and (ii) to search for a molecular marker among these groups of bacteria that was consistently present in the manure intended for land application. In the first part of this study, the persistence of the dominant bacteria throughout treatment was studied by using molecular typing, capillary electrophoresis-single-strand conformation polymorphism (CE-SSCP) (45) based on the analysis of the 16S rRNA genes. CE-SSCP is a fingerprinting technique in which single-stranded DNA fragments of the same length are separated based on the conformation of their secondary structure (23). The major advantages of this technique are its reproducibility between runs and its high resolution power with fewer false results than with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (25, 26).The second part of this article describes the relevance of the potential marker of pig manure (Bifidobacterium thermacidophilum subsp. porcinum) selected according to the results of the CE-SSCP profiles and the subsequent identification of dominant peaks of the CE-SSCP profiles. The specificity of this pig marker was then tested by assessing the host distribution in a selection of fecal, manure, and wastewater samples.