| Abstract: | The portable instrument described by Heathcote, Etherington,and Woodward (1979) for the non-destructive measurement of turgorpressure was evaluated in Helianthus annuus and Helianthus paradoxus.A good correlation was obtained between turgor pressure measuredwith the instrument and turgor pressure estimated by the pressure-volumetechnique for individual leaves allowed to dry after excision;however, variation in both the intercept and slope of the relationshipoccurred between leaves. Consequently, there was no correlationbetween the output of the instrument for individual leaves andthe turgor pressure of the same leaves estimated by conventionalmethods. Moreover, for a given leaf, the instrument had onlya limited ability to detect temporal variation in turgor pressurewhen compared with turgor pressure calculated from measuredvalues of leaf water potential and leaf osmotic potential. Theinstrument's output was influenced by its proximity to majorveins and by leaf thickness. We conclude that variability inleaf thickness and the presence of large veins limits its usefulnessfor measurement of turgor pressure in Helianthus. Key words: Leaf thickness, Turgormeter, Turgor pressure, Helianthus |
