The Importance of Body Stiffness in Undulatory Propulsion

During steady swimming in fish, the dynamic form taken by theaxial undulatory wave may depend on the bending stiffness ofthe body. Previous studies have suggested the hypothesis thatfish use their muscles to modulate body stiffness. In orderto expand the theoretical and experimental tools available fortesting this hypothesis, we explored the relationship betweenbody stiffness, muscle activity, and undulatory waveform inthe mechanical context of dynamically bending beams. We proposethat fish minimize the mechanical cost of bending by increasingtheir body stiffness, which would allow them to tune their body'snatural frequency to match the tailbeat frequency at a givenswimming speed. A review of the literature reveals that theform of the undulatory wave, as measured by propulsive wavelength,is highly variable within species, a result which calls intoquestion the use of propulsive wavelength as a species-specificindicator of swimming mode. At the same time, the smallest wavelengthwithin a species is inversely proportional to the number ofvertebrae across taxa (r² = 0.21). In order to determine ifintact fish bodies are capable of increasing bending stiffness,we introduce a method for stimulating muscle in the body ofa dead fish while it is being cyclically bent at physiologicalfrequencies. The bending moment (N m) and angular displacement(radians) are measured during dynamic bending with and withoutmuscle stimulation. Initial results from these whole body workloops demonstrate that largemouth bass possess the capabilityto increase body stiffness by using their muscles to generatenegative mechanical work.