Sporophyte Formation and Life Cycle Completion in Moss Requires Heterotrimeric G-Proteins

In this study, we report the functional characterization of heterotrimeric G-proteins from a nonvascular plant, the moss Physcomitrella patens. In plants, G-proteins have been characterized from only a few angiosperms to date, where their involvement has been shown during regulation of multiple signaling and developmental pathways affecting overall plant fitness. In addition to its unparalleled evolutionary position in the plant lineages, the P. patens genome also codes for a unique assortment of G-protein components, which includes two copies of Gβ and Gγ genes, but no canonical Gα. Instead, a single gene encoding an extra-large Gα (XLG) protein exists in the P. patens genome. Here, we demonstrate that in P. patens the canonical Gα is biochemically and functionally replaced by an XLG protein, which works in the same genetic pathway as one of the Gβ proteins to control its development. Furthermore, the specific G-protein subunits in P. patens are essential for its life cycle completion. Deletion of the genomic locus of PpXLG or PpGβ2 results in smaller, slower growing gametophores. Normal reproductive structures develop on these gametophores, but they are unable to form any sporophyte, the only diploid stage in the moss life cycle. Finally, the mutant phenotypes of ΔPpXLG and ΔPpGβ2 can be complemented by the homologous genes from Arabidopsis, AtXLG2 and AtAGB1, respectively, suggesting an overall conservation of their function throughout the plant evolution.In all known eukaryotes, cellular signaling involves heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins), which consist of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits (Cabrera-Vera et al., 2003). According to the established paradigm, when Gα is GDP-bound, it forms a trimeric complex with the Gβγ dimer and remains associated with a G-protein coupled receptor. Signal perception by the receptor facilitates GDP to GTP exchange on Gα. GTP-Gα dissociates from the Gβγ dimer, and both these entities can transduce the signal by interacting with different effectors. The duration of the active state is determined by the intrinsic GTPase activity of Gα, which hydrolyzes bound GTP into GDP and inorganic phosphate (Pi), followed by the reassociation of the inactive, trimeric complex (Siderovski and Willard, 2005).In plants, G-protein signaling has been studied in only a few angiosperms to date at the functional level, although the proteins exist in the entire plant lineage (Hackenberg and Pandey, 2014; Urano and Jones, 2014; Hackenberg et al., 2016). Interestingly, while the overall biochemistry of the individual G-protein components and the interactions between them are conserved between plant and metazoan systems, deviations from the established norm are also obvious. For example, the repertoire of canonical G-proteins is significantly limited in plants; the human genome codes for 23 Gα, 5 Gβ, and 12 Gγ proteins, whereas most plant genomes, including those of basal plants, typically encode 1 canonical Gα, 1 Gβ, and three to five Gγ proteins (Urano and Jones, 2014). The only exceptions are some polyploid species, such as soybean, which have retained most of the duplicated G-protein genes (Bisht et al., 2011; Choudhury et al., 2011). Moreover, even in plants that possess only a single canonical Gα and Gβ protein, for example Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and rice, the phenotypes of plants lacking either one or both proteins are relatively subtle. The mutant plants exhibit multiple developmental and signaling defects but are able to complete the life cycle without any major consequences. These observations have questioned the significance of G-protein mediated signaling pathways in plants.Interestingly, plants also possess certain unique variants of the classical G-protein components such as the type III Cys-rich Gγ proteins and extra-large GTP-binding (XLG) proteins, which add to the diversity and expanse of the G-protein signaling networks (Roy Choudhury et al., 2011; Chakravorty et al., 2015; Maruta et al., 2015). The XLG proteins are almost twice the size of typical Gα proteins, with the C-terminal region that codes for Gα-like domain and an extended N-terminal region without any distinctive features. Plant XLGs are encoded by entirely independent genes and therefore are different from the mammalian extra-long versions of Gα proteins such as XLαs and XXLαs, which are expressed due to the use of alternate exons (Abramowitz et al., 2004). Three to five copies of XLG proteins are present in the genome of most angiosperms. At the functional level, the XLG proteins have been characterized only from Arabidopsis, to date, where recent studies suggest that the proteins compete with canonical Gα for binding with the Gβγ dimers and may form functional trimeric complexes (Chakravorty et al., 2015; Maruta et al., 2015). The XLG and Gβγ mutants of Arabidopsis seem to function in the same pathways during the regulation of a subset of plant responses, for example primary root length and its regulation by abscisic acid (ABA); the root waving and skewing responses; sensitivity to Glc, salt, and tunicamycin; and sensitivity to certain bacterial and fungal pathogens (Ding et al., 2008; Pandey et al., 2008; Chakravorty et al., 2015; Maruta et al., 2015). However, many of the phenotypes of Arabidopsis Gα and Gβγ mutants are also distinct from that of the xlg triple mutants. For example, compared to the wild-type plants, the canonical G-protein mutants exhibit altered response to gibberellic acid, brassinosteroids, and auxin and show changes in leaf shape, branching, flowering time, and stomatal densities (Ullah et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2004; Pandey et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2008; Nilson and Assmann, 2010). The xlg triple mutants behave similarly to wild-type plants in all these aspects of development and signaling. Moreover, whether the XLG proteins are authentic GTP-binding and -hydrolyzing proteins and the extent to which they directly participate in G-protein-mediated signaling pathways remains confounding (Chakravorty et al., 2015; Maruta et al., 2015). Even in plants with a limited number of G-protein subunits such as Arabidopsis, one Gα and three XLGs potentially compete for a single Gβ protein, and the analysis of null mutants is not straightforward, that is, it is not possible to delineate whether the phenotypes seen in the Gα null mutants are truly due to the lack of Gα and/or because of an altered stoichiometry or availability of Gβ for the XLG proteins.As a bryophyte, Physcomitrella patens occupies a unique position in the evolutionary history of plants. It lacks vasculature but exhibits alteration between generations, which is dominated by a gametophytic (haploid) phase and a short sporophytic (diploid) phase (Cove et al., 2009). Many of the pathways related to hormone signaling, stress responses, and development are conserved between angiosperms and P. patens (Cove et al., 2009; Sun, 2011; Komatsu et al., 2013; Yasumura et al., 2015). It is also an intriguing example in the context of the G-protein signaling, because its fully sequenced genome does not encode a canonical Gα gene, although genes coding for the Gβ and Gγ proteins exist. A single gene for a potential XLG homolog also exists in the P. patens genome. This unique assortment of proteins predicts several alternative scenarios for G-protein signaling in P. patens. For example, the P. patens Gβγ proteins might be nonfunctional due to the loss of canonical Gα and are left in the genome as evolutionary artifacts. Alternatively, the Gβγ proteins of P. patens might maintain functionality regardless of the existence of a canonical Gα protein in pathways not regulated via classic G-protein signaling modes. Finally, a more likely scenario could be that the potential XLG protein can substitute for the Gα function in P. patens.To explore these possibilities and understand better the conserved and unique mechanisms of G-protein signaling pathways in plants and their significance, we examined the role of G-protein subunits in P. patens. We provide unambiguous evidence for the genetic coupling of XLG and Gβ proteins in controlling P. patens development. In contrast to all other plant species analyzed to date, where G-proteins are not essential for growth and survival, the XLG or one of the Gβ proteins is required for the sporophyte formation and life cycle completion in P. patens. Furthermore, one of the Arabidopsis XLG proteins, XLG2, and the canonical Gβ protein AGB1 can functionally complement the P. patens mutant phenotypes. These data provide new insights in the evolutionary breadth and the spectrum of signaling pathways regulated by G-proteins in plants.