The Development of Metaphor Comprehension and Its Relationship with Relational Verbal Reasoning and Executive Function |
| |
Authors: | Nuria Carriedo Antonio Corral Pedro R. Montoro Laura Herrero Patricia Ballestrino Iraia Sebastián |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, National Distance Education University (UNED), Madrid, Spain;2. Departamento de Psicología Básica 1, National Distance Education University (UNED), Madrid, Spain;3. Facultad de Educación, Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain;The University of Nottingham, UNITED KINGDOM |
| |
Abstract: | Our main objective was to analyse the different contributions of relational verbal reasoning (analogical and class inclusion) and executive functioning to metaphor comprehension across development. We postulated that both relational reasoning and executive functioning should predict individual and developmental differences. However, executive functioning would become increasingly involved when metaphor comprehension is highly demanding, either because of the metaphors’ high difficulty (relatively novel metaphors in the absence of a context) or because of the individual’s special processing difficulties, such as low levels of reading experience or low semantic knowledge. Three groups of participants, 11-year-olds, 15-year-olds and young adults, were assessed in different relational verbal reasoning tasks—analogical and class-inclusion—and in executive functioning tasks—updating information in working memory, inhibition, and shifting. The results revealed clear progress in metaphor comprehension between ages 11 and 15 and between ages 15 and 21. However, the importance of executive function in metaphor comprehension was evident by age 15 and was restricted to updating information in working memory and cognitive inhibition. Participants seemed to use two different strategies to interpret metaphors: relational verbal reasoning and executive functioning. This was clearly shown when comparing the performance of the "more efficient" participants in metaphor interpretation with that of the "less efficient” ones. Whereas in the first case none of the executive variables or those associated with relational verbal reasoning were significantly related to metaphor comprehension, in the latter case, both groups of variables had a clear predictor effect. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|