Circadian organization inAplysia: internal desynchronization and amplitude of locomotor rhythm

Summary We have tested the hypothesis that the circadian oscillators in the eyes ofAplysia are coequal driver oscillators for the circadian locomotor rhythm. Three predictions based on this hypothesis were tested. Prediction 1: at a time when the phase difference between the eye rhythms is small, the amplitude of the locomotor rhythm in two eyed animals will be as great or greater than the amplitude in one eyed animals. Prediction 2: the amplitude of the locomotor rhythm of two eyed animals will decline under conditions in which the two eye rhythms become out of phase with each other. Prediction 3: the form of the locomotor rhythm will broaden or become biphasic in two eyed animals when the two eye rhythms become out of phase with each other.None of the predictions was confirmed. One eyedAplysia had higher amplitude locomotor rhythms than two eyedAplysia, even under conditions in which the two eye rhythms were probably not far out of phase with each other. There was no tendency for the amplitude of the locomotor rhythm of two eyed animals to decline under circumstances in which the phase difference between the two eye rhythms changes from less than 4 h to as much as 11.5 h. There was no tendency in two eyed animals for the locomotor rhythm to broaden or become biphasic as the eye rhythms became more out of phase with each other.The results led us to reject the hypothesis that the eyes are co-equal drivers for the locomotor rhythm. The ocular influence on locomotion is more likely to be mediated via mechanisms in the central nervous system that do not faithfully conserve the phase of the eye rhythms. One possibility is that the driver is a third circadian oscillator that interacts with the two eye oscillators.Abbreviations CAP compound action potentials - CC constant conditions - CT circadian time - DO driver oscillator - EO eye oscillator - RSD relative standard deviations (see Methods)