Evidence for a specific uptake system for iron phytosiderophores in roots of grasses

Roots of grasses in response to iron deficiency markedly increase the release of chelating substances (`phytosiderophores') which are highly effective in solubilization of sparingly soluble inorganic Fe<sup>III</sup> compounds by formation of Fe<sup>III</sup>phytosiderophores. In barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), the rate of iron uptake from Fe<sup>III</sup>phytosiderophores is 100 to 1000 times faster than the rate from synthetic Fe chelates (e.g. Fe ethylenediaminetetraacetate) or microbial Fe siderophores (e.g. ferrichrome). Reduction of Fe<sup>III</sup> is not involved in the preferential iron uptake from Fe<sup>III</sup>phytosiderophores by barley. This is indicated by experiments with varied pH, addition of bicarbonate or of a strong chelator for Fe<sup>II</sup> (e.g. batho-phenanthrolinedisulfonate). The results indicate the existence of a specific uptake system for Fe<sup>III</sup>phytosiderophores in roots of barley and all other graminaceous species. In contrast to grasses, cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) take up iron from Fe<sup>III</sup>phytosiderophores at rates similar to those from synthetic Fe chelates. Furthermore, under Fe deficiency in cucumber, increased rates of uptake of Fe<sup>III</sup>phytosiderophores are based on the same mechanism as for synthetic Fe chelates, namely enhanced Fe<sup>III</sup> reduction and chelate splitting. Two strategies are evident from the experiments for the acquisition of iron by plants under iron deficiency. Strategy I (in most nongraminaceous species) is characterized by an inducible plasma membrane-bound reductase and enhancement of H<sup>+</sup> release. Strategy II (in grasses) is characterized by enhanced release of phytosiderophores and by a highly specific uptake system for Fe<sup>III</sup>phytosiderophores. Strategy II seems to have several ecological advantages over Strategy I such as solubilization of sparingly soluble inorganic Fe<sup>III</sup> compounds in the rhizosphere, and less inhibition by high pH. The principal differences in the two strategies have to be taken into account in screening methods for resistance to `lime chlorosis'.