Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal |
| |
Authors: | Catherine E. Sheppard Richard Inger Robbie A. McDonald Sam Barker Andrew L. Jackson Faye J. Thompson Emma I. K. Vitikainen Michael A. Cant Harry H. Marshall |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, UK;2. Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Cornwall, UK;3. Department of Zoology, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland;4. Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;5. Centre for Research in Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, University of Roehampton, London, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Individual foraging specialisation has important ecological implications, but its causes in group‐living species are unclear. One of the major consequences of group living is increased intragroup competition for resources. Foraging theory predicts that with increased competition, individuals should add new prey items to their diet, widening their foraging niche (‘optimal foraging hypothesis’). However, classic competition theory suggests the opposite: that increased competition leads to niche partitioning and greater individual foraging specialisation (‘niche partitioning hypothesis’). We tested these opposing predictions in wild, group‐living banded mongooses (Mungos mungo), using stable isotope analysis of banded mongoose whiskers to quantify individual and group foraging niche. Individual foraging niche size declined with increasing group size, despite all groups having a similar overall niche size. Our findings support the prediction that competition promotes niche partitioning within social groups and suggest that individual foraging specialisation may play an important role in the formation of stable social groupings. |
| |
Keywords: | Banded mongoose competition foraging behaviour foraging niche group‐living
Mungos mungo
social group specialisation stable isotope |
|
|