Stomata of Micropropagated DelphiniumPlants Respond to ABA, CO2, Light and Water Potential, but Fail to Close Fully

Morphological and physiological characteristics of micropropagatedplants of Delphinium cv. Princess Caroline were studied. Leavesproduced in vitro showed poor control of water loss which appearsto result from restricted responses by stomata and not frompoor cuticular development. Stomata of leaves produced in vitrowere larger and more frequent than those produced during acclimatization.Despite the fact that stomata from isolated epidermis of leavesproduced in vitro reduced their apertures when exposed to turgor-reducingtreatments, they did not close fully. This, together with highstomatal frequencies might explain the poor control of waterloss shown by intact leaves produced in culture when exposedto dry air. While leaves from acclimatized plants showed almostcomplete closure with ABA, low water potentials, darkness andCO₂, stomata from leaves produced in vitro reduced their apertureswhen exposed to those factors, but only to a limit. Therefore,stomata from leaves cultured in vitro seem to be partially functional,but some physiological or anatomical alteration prevents themfrom closing fully. Stomata from leaves produced in vitro wereparticularly insensitive to ABA which appears to be partly associatedwith the high cytokinin concentration in the culture medium.In the long-term, this stomatal insensitivity to ABA might contributeto plant losses when micropropagated plantlets are transferredto soil. Key words: Micropropagation, stomatal physiology, dehydration, PEG, ABA, BAP, darkness, CO₂, Delphinium