Effects of Easy-to-Use Protein-Rich Energy Bar on Energy Balance,Physical Activity and Performance during 8 Days of Sustained Physical Exertion |
| |
| Authors: | Minna M Tanskanen Klaas R Westerterp Arja L Uusitalo Mustafa Atalay Keijo H?kkinen Hannu O Kinnunen Heikki Kyr?l?inen |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Biology of Physical Activity, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.; 2. Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.; 3. Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.; 4. Institute of Biomedicine, Physiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.; 5. Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland.; University of Valencia, Spain, |
| |
| Abstract: | BackgroundPrevious military studies have shown an energy deficit during a strenuous field training course (TC). This study aimed to determine the effects of energy bar supplementation on energy balance, physical activity (PA), physical performance and well-being and to evaluate ad libitum fluid intake during wintertime 8-day strenuous TC.MethodsTwenty-six men (age 20±1 yr.) were randomly divided into two groups: The control group (n = 12) had traditional field rations and the experimental (Ebar) group (n = 14) field rations plus energy bars of 4.1 MJ•day−1. Energy (EI) and water intake was recorded. Fat-free mass and water loss were measured with deuterium dilution and elimination, respectively. The energy expenditure was calculated using the intake/balance method and energy availability as (EI/estimated basal metabolic rate). PA was monitored using an accelerometer. Physical performance was measured and questionnaires of upper respiratory tract infections (URTI), hunger and mood state were recorded before, during and after TC.ResultsEbar had a higher EI and energy availability than the controls. However, decreases in body mass and fat mass were similar in both groups representing an energy deficit. No differences were observed between the groups in PA, water balance, URTI symptoms and changes in physical performance and fat-free mass. Ebar felt less hunger after TC than the controls and they had improved positive mood state during the latter part of TC while controls did not. Water deficit associated to higher PA. Furthermore, URTI symptoms and negative mood state associated negatively with energy availability and PA.ConclusionAn easy-to-use protein-rich energy bars did not prevent energy deficit nor influence PA during an 8-day TC. The high content of protein in the bars might have induced satiation decreasing energy intake from field rations. PA and energy intake seems to be primarily affected by other factors than energy supplementation such as mood state. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
