首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Improved patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with abatacept: results from a phase 3 trial
Authors:Vibeke Strand  Evo Alemao  Thomas Lehman  Alyssa Johnsen  Subhashis Banerjee  Harris A Ahmad  Philip J Mease
Institution:1.Division of Immunology/Rheumatology,Stanford University School of Medicine,Palo Alto,USA;2.Bristol-Myers Squibb,Princeton,USA;3.Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington,Seattle,USA
Abstract:

Background

To explore the effect of abatacept treatment on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods

Patients with PsA were randomised (1:1) to subcutaneous abatacept 125?mg weekly/placebo for 24?weeks with early escape (EE) to open-label abatacept (week 16). Adjusted mean changes from baseline to weeks 16 (all patients) and 24 (non-EE responders) in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Short Form-36 (SF-36; physical and mental component summary and domains), Dermatology Life Quality Index and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) were evaluated. Subpopulations were analysed by baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level (> vs?≤?upper limit of normal ULN]) and prior tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) exposure. Proportions of patients reporting improvements ≥ minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and?≥?normative values (NVs) in HAQ-DI, SF-36 and FACIT-F (week 16 before EE) were analysed.

Results

In total population, numerically higher improvements in most PROs were reported with abatacept (n?=?213) versus placebo (n?=?211) at both time points (P?>?0.05). Higher proportions of abatacept versus placebo patients reported PRO improvements ≥ MCID and?≥?NV at week 16. At week 16, all PRO improvements were numerically greater (P?>?0.05) in patients with baseline CRP?>?ULN versus CRP?≤?ULN (all significant 95% confidence interval] for abatacept vs placebo); improvements in SF-36 component summaries and FACIT-F were greater in TNFi-naïve versus TNFi-exposed patients (abatacept > placebo). Week 24 subgroup data were difficult to interpret due to low patient numbers.

Conclusions

Abatacept treatment improved PROs in patients with PsA versus placebo, with better results in elevated baseline CRP and TNFi-naïve subpopulations.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01860976 (funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb); date of registration: 23 May 2013.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号