Comparative vegetative anatomy and classification of Diseae (Orchidaceae) |
| |
Authors: | H KURZWEIL H P LINDER W L STERN FLS A M PRIDGEON FLS |
| |
Institution: | Compton Herbarium, National Botanical Institute, Claremont 7735, South Africa;Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town, 7700 Rondebosch, South Africa;Department of Botany, University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32611-2009, USA;Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB |
| |
Abstract: | The leaf, stem, root, tuber and dropper anatomy of the orchid tribe Diseae (including the subtribes Satyriinae, Disinae, Brownlecinac, Huttonaeinae and Coryciinae) is reviewed. The study is largely based on investigations of 123 species, and data from several previous publications have also been incorporated. Two characters were identified as being taxonomically valuable: (1) the presence of sclerenchyma caps associated with leaf vascular bundles, and (2) the degree of dissection of the siphonostele of the tuber ('polystelic' or 'monostelic'). The phylogenetic analysis shows that anatomical characters do not change the basic structure of a cladogram that is based on morphological characters. The taxa of Diseae are discussed on the basis of anatomical data. Subtribes Satyriinae (excluding the anatomically unusual genus Pachites), Brownleeinae, Huttonaeinae, and Coryciinae are uniform in. critical anatomical characters. However, subtribe Disinae is rather diverse in vegetative anatomy. Disa sect. Micranthae differs from the rest of the genus in its leaf anatomy. The occurrence of foliar sclerenchyma bundle caps and 'polystelic' tubers supports the incorporation of Herschelianthe in Disa sect. Stenocarpa. |
| |
Keywords: | cladistic analysis |
|
|