Temporal characterization of serum metabolite signatures in lung cancer patients undergoing treatment |
| |
Authors: | Desirée Hao M. Omair Sarfaraz Farshad Farshidfar D. Gwyn Bebb Camelia Y. Lee Cynthia M. Card Marilyn David Aalim M. Weljie |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre and Cumming School of Medicine,University of Calgary,Calgary,Canada;2.Department of Biological Sciences,University of Calgary,Calgary,Canada;3.Department of Medicine-Pathology and Molecular Medicine,McMaster University,Hamilton,Canada;4.Department of Medical Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine,University of Calgary,Calgary,Canada;5.Tom Baker Cancer Centre,Calgary,Canada;6.Clinical Research Unit,Tom Baker Cancer Centre,Calgary,Canada;7.Institute of Translational Medicine and Therapeutics,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia,USA;8.Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia,USA |
| |
Abstract: | Lung cancer causes more deaths in men and women than any other cancer related disease. Currently, few effective strategies exist to predict how patients will respond to treatment. We evaluated the serum metabolomic profiles of 25 lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy ± radiation to evaluate the feasibility of metabolites as temporal biomarkers of clinical outcomes. Serial serum specimens collected prospectively from lung cancer patients were analyzed using both nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) spectroscopy and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Multivariate statistical analysis consisted of unsupervised principal component analysis or orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis with significance assessed using a cross-validated ANOVA. The metabolite profiles were reflective of the temporal distinction between patient samples before during and after receiving therapy (1H-NMR, p < 0.001: and GC–MS p < 0.01). Disease progression and survival were strongly correlative with the GC–MS metabolite data whereas stage and cancer type were associated with 1H-NMR data. Metabolites such as hydroxylamine, tridecan-1-ol, octadecan-1-ol, were indicative of survival (GC–MS p < 0.05) and metabolites such as tagatose, hydroxylamine, glucopyranose, and threonine that were reflective of progression (GC–MS p < 0.05). Metabolite profiles have the potential to act as prognostic markers of clinical outcomes for lung cancer patients. Serial 1H-NMR measurements appear to detect metabolites diagnostic of tumor pathology, while GC–MS provided data better related to prognostic clinical outcomes, possibility due to physiochemical bias related to specific biochemical pathways. These results warrant further study in a larger cohort and with various treatment options. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|