Identification of ubiquinone as the secondary electron acceptor in the photosynthetic apparatus of Chromatium vinosum

Extracting Chromatium vinosum chromatophores with light petroleum destroys their ability to perform photochemistry on the second of two closely-spaced actinic flashes, without affecting photochemistry on the first flash. Extraction also increases the likelihood of a back-reaction in which an electron returns from the primary electron acceptor directly to P₈₇₀. These effects probably reflect the removal of a secondary electron acceptor. Extraction does not appear to interfere with the primary photochemical reaction. Reconstituting the extracted chromatophores with the lipid extract or with pure ubiquinone (Q) completely reverses the effects of the extraction. Chromatography of the lipid extract shows that Q is the only active material that it contains in detectable quantity. These observations support the conclusion that Q is the secondary electron acceptor.

Piericidin A, certain alkyl-substituted quinolinequinones, and a substituted 4,7-dioxobenzothiazole inhibit electron transfer between the primary and secondary acceptors. The sensitivity to these inhibitors, and the participation of Q and non-heme iron suggest that the secondary electron-transfer reaction resembles the reactions catalyzed by respiratory dehydrogenases.

The proton uptake that follows flash excitation does not seem to be tightly linked to the reduction of the secondary electron acceptor. It still occurs (though with decreased amplitude) in extracted chromatophores, and even in the presence of inhibitors of the secondary electron-transfer reaction.