首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Effect of alfaprostol on postpartum reproductive efficiency in brahman cows and heifers
Authors:Randel R D  Del Vecchio R P  Neuendorff D A  Peterson L A
Affiliation:Texas A&M University Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Overton, TX 75684, USA.
Abstract:Brahman cows (n = 54) and heifers (n = 18) were randomly allotted by calving date, sex of calf and age to one of four treatment groups. Group 1 received no treatment (control), Group 2 received 5 mg alfaprostol (AP) i.m. on Day 21 postpartum, Group 3 received 5 mg AP i.m. on Day 32 postpartum and Group 4 received 5 mg AP i.m. on both Days 21 and 32 postpartum. Blood samples were collected via tail vessel puncture at 30 min-intervals for 8 h from half the animals in each group on Days 21 and 32 postpartum, with AP injection administered 2 h after sampling had begun. All cows were bled at weekly intervals. Samples were processed to yield serum and stored at -20 degrees C until assayed for luteinizing hormone (LH) or progesterone (P(4)). All cattle were maintained with epididymectomized marker bulls and were artificially inseminated (A.I.) at first estrus. Serum P(4) was below 1 ng/ml prior to AP treatment in all animals and did not differ (P > 0.10) between treatments. Alfaprostol treatment affected mean postpartum interval (from parturition to return to standing estrus and subsequent corpus luteum formation with serum progesterone concentrations > 1 ng/ml; P < 0.08). The control group (84.8 +/- 7.9 d) did not differ from Group 2 (86.3 +/- 11.1 d) or Group 3 (66.7 +/- 5.5 d) but did differ (P < 0.09) from Group 4 (65.1 +/- 6.4 d). Cattle injected on Day 32 had a shorter (P < 0.01) postpartum interval than those not receiving treatment on that day (65.9 +/- 4.2 vs 85.7 +/- 6.8 d). Pregnancy rate was affected (P < 0.05) by AP treatment. The control group (72.2%) did not differ (P > 0.10) from any group but, Group 2 (50.0%) was lower (P < 0.04) than Group 3 (83.3%) and (P < 0.02) Group 4 (88.9%). Cattle treated on Day 32 (Groups 3 and 4) had a higher (P < 0.02) pregnancy rate (86.1%) than those not treated on Day 32 (Groups 1 and 2; 61.1%). Serum LH was affected by day (P < 0.0003) and treatment by day (P < 0.07) but not by time (P > 0.10). Treatment Group 3 (P < 0.08) and Group 4 (P < 0.0003) mean LH concentrations differed between Days 21 and 32 postpartum. Cattle receiving AP treatment on Day 32 postpartum had a higher (P < 0.04) cumulative frequency of return to estrus by 100 days postpartum than nontreated cattle.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号